Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 5
  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

SG Article Marine Units
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:31 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I think the Crusader should be a serious option for core Codex chapters - it has long ago ceased to be a BT-specific vehicle, and the current C:SM has no restrictions on it. It should be a Codex vehicle, IMO, at least for "house rules".


Most FW vehicles (Like the Helios for example) are also not Chapter-specific gear at this point.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:37 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA
Okay, here's a rough list thrown together. I've done this from memory, so let me know if there are any obvious errors (I can't remember the Prometheus' transport capacity, for example).

I've not included Scout Bikers and Veterans since they're already in a FOL article.

Also note for comparative purposes, I've assumed a normal Land Raider's FF to be 4+.

EDIT: and - since I'm just playing here - I've tweaked the LR Crusader the way I'd have it!  :p

Here you go:
http://geocities.com/eoinwhelan/SMvehicles.htm
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I note you've tweaked the points cost of the Transporter a little too. :)

Looks nice!




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
BlackLegion
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Like you units stats too :) But not sure about the transport capacity of some of these, too.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lion in the Stars
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:09 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 1455
Unless we rename the 'Multimelta' on a Crusader to 'Pintle Multimelta'.  Either way works, I'd just prefer to see the renamed version.

I'm OK with that list, Lord =I=.  BlackLegion, those transport capacities are right in line with the 40k stats.  My only quibble is the Damocles, as I think it should have something more than just 'Leader'.  What exactly, I'm not sure, but it needs something.

I can live with the FO76 Marine upgrades, and a reference to them in our article would be fine (or some tweaks to them for balance, if needed, like those Librarian rules).

_________________
"For the Lion and the Emperor!"
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lion in the Stars
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:14 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 1455
If it's not enough, you're in trouble.

I must have missed the dread stats.  

Like I said, it doesn't really matter, and most of the LRCs I've seen have only had the Multimelta, without a pintle stormbolter (the usual source of FF attacks on Marine vehicles).  I suppose for consistency we should have every MM change the FF attack to Macro.

_________________
"For the Lion and the Emperor!"
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I suppose for consistency we should have every MM change the FF attack to Macro.


I think that's appropriate.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA
The Thunderhawk Transporter's points is - after much uming and ahing - back to what I originally proposed to begin with. I certainly don't see any reason to make a discount price for two.

"Only thing that sticks out is the +1EA on multimelta. That shouldn't be EA, but change the original hit into MW. "

Yeah, I see the point here. However, it is much neater than the alternative - it would be confusing: so does the multi-melta give an extra attack, give MW to only the basic attack, or give all of the attacks MW?

I did something similar with my Slaanesh Daemon Prince and it was confusing. Modifiying the basic attack but not the extra attacks just looks... wrong.

But, if we go back to only +1 for the hurricane bolters, and give the MW an extra attack, it averages out (i.e. 1MW and 2 normal attacks).

The reason the tank has quite so many attacks is because it's that shooty in 40k! Twelve bolters, two assault cannon and a multimelta!

Still, I agree, 4 attacks is too much, I was thinking that yesterday.

SO:

- I'll remove one of the EA from the Hurricane Bolters
- I'll rename the multimelta "pintel multimelta"

I'll edit the stats when I can.

I was thinking of giving the command tanks "Commander", but I don't think that's quite appropriate. I think Leader is okay, but I'm open to suggestions. EDIT: The problem with Commander is that there isn't any reason to take a Captain, since you can get the Commander ability from the tank and take a more attractive Librarian or Chaplain.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I think commander is very appropriate for the command tanks. :)


I'd be tempted to keep the Dreadnought's FF at 4+ too... it's very hard to get to use that slow-moving attack.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
BlackLegion
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Nearly all my MM equipped Salamanders units have their FF-Value worsened by 1.
There was some discussion about it overthere in SG-Forums.

http://www.specialist-games.com/forum/t ... IC_ID=8014




_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA
As I said in my sneaky edit, my main concern is that Commander makes Captains totally redundant.

I really don't like the idea of a single multi-melta giving FF4+! Besides, the only time I see dreads is in Thunderhawks, where I'd pick a melta dread over an assault cannon one as the range isn't a factor.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(Lord Inquisitor @ Oct. 12 2006,15:21)
QUOTE
I really don't like the idea of a single multi-melta giving FF4+! Besides, the only time I see dreads is in Thunderhawks, where I'd pick a melta dread over an assault cannon one as the range isn't a factor.

Ah but I play with Dread Formations where they're a little more common (Still pretty damn rare though).

Still, FF5+ isn't such a bad thing.


As I said in my sneaky edit, my main concern is that Commander makes Captains totally redundant.


Then how about looking to the 40k rules for extra features... don't command vehicles in that provide the ability to use Imperial Navy support with Marine armies?

So how about taking a Command vehicle lets you re-roll one Inititive roll for an Imperial Navy formation per turn?

I can't remember their other rules offhand.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
BlackLegion
 Post subject: SG Article Marine Units
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:31 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Why don't give the Damocles SupremeCommander but that there could be still another SupremeCommander in the army with the exception that BOTH can us their SupremeCommander ability?

Else it would make a neat model for the Blitz Objective :D

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 5
  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net