I think that a review of all the boards that have been created would be a very good idea, as I think that we've ended up with too many. A proposed restructuring could go a little like this:

Net Epic - This is the main board which should be used for all rules questions, general questions/discussion, tactics, and army lists.

Because there are fewer players for NetEpic than EA, I don't think that separate boards for tactics and army lists can be justified.

Net Epic Core Rules Amendments, Changes, and Updates - This is a child board for discussion of possible changes to the core rules. These would be minor to clear up ambiguous wording or fix errors in the book. Major rule changes would belong in......

Net Epic Alternative Rules (Could rename this Net Epic Platinum or Net Epic Rules Development) - This is a child board for major changes or reworking of the NetEpic rules.

Note that I think that we need to merge the Platinum and Alternative Rules boards. Having two boards for development of rules outside of Gold seems a bit over the top to me, unless I'm missing something. If I am, please say so .

Net Epic Army List Development - This is a child board for development of Gold, Platinum, and Alternative army lists. Please tag your topic as either [Gold], [Platinum], or [Alternative]. Note that Gold lists are fixed for the most part, so only mistakes, ambiguous wording, or minor changes should be discussed in relation to these lists.

There isn't enough activity to justify a separate child board for every army list.

Net Epic Battle Reports and Net Epic Background - These would remain as they are.

Finally, The EpiCentre board seems dead, could that just be archived?

Hi!

Here is a thought, why don't each of you post the organization of what you view the most optimal way of laying them out and we can focus on the differences and produce a working organization scheme.

Primarch