Thank you for the heads-up on the lists.
Quote:
As to attendance you are correct. But if the same people keep coming back then something must be good about it wouldn't you think?
Oh, absolutely – please don't think that I'm implying anything negative about the tournament scene (I'm keen to attend one in 2012 – any recommendations for a newish player?

). I mention sample bias merely because it's a possibility that such a close-knit group's choices have a circular effect on what's normal.
From a quick squizz at the lists, those nearest the bottom of the page
Clicky Link, which are the oldest lists (right?) are really diverse; while those nearer the top (i.e. more recent) get progressively more similar to one another.
It was mentioned in an earlier thread that a player with an unusual 'mud marines' list (i.e. the sort of list that's regarded as sub-optimal) had done well and surprised the rest of the field.
How does that relate back to the thread? Well; my point is that tournament gaming may well include the most experienced players; but it doesn't follow that appealing to tournament lists will hold the correct answers to whether Dobbsy's changes should be included or not.