Imperial Guard Hellhounds? |
Shadow Hunter
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:52 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:41 am Posts: 1747 Location: Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffs, UK
|
Erm, why are these 4+ armour?
I am trying to make an Imperial Guard army so that I can have a game against another guy (who will use Imperial Guard) and noticed the hellhounds outstanding armour value. Howcome, despite its 40K rules (glancing count as penetrating), does it get a better save than a Chimera?
Also, how come its Inferno cannon has the same range as a Multilaser? 30cm? Its a template weapon in 40K.
What's going on?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
vanvlak
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:18 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:52 am Posts: 10348 Location: Malta
|
Hi Shadow Hunter, I think the Hellhound has lost its glancing=penetrating in 40K....and the flame template can be 'shot' some distance away; don't have the IG codex here to confirm, though.
_________________ Back from oblivion (again)?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadow Hunter
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:10 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:41 am Posts: 1747 Location: Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffs, UK
|
I forgot IG had a new codex out. I haven't seen it yet. Still, even without that rule, it shouldn't be any tougher than a Chimera.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadow Hunter
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:02 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:41 am Posts: 1747 Location: Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffs, UK
|
I take it these 40K alterations came about because no-one used the hellhounds.
Okay, it helps to explain it to me now.
Now just to get the army glued together for him, and primed. Note:- I'm not painting them though, I already have enough to do. 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CrimsonFury
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:36 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:04 pm Posts: 766
|
Yeah, alot of stuff was get used in the previous guard list.
Nearly all the IG armies I saw with the old codex consisted of:
3 heavy support vehicles out of: basilisks\leman russ\leman russ demolisher a ton of infantry and heavy weapon squads maybe a couple of chimeras and a sentinal squadron
Everything else was unused: ratlings, storm troopers, hardend veterans, ogryns, hellhounds, roughriders.
All of those units have been tweaked a fair bit. The hellhound was the only one that changed enough to affect its Epic coutner part. Most of the other changes were adjust ments of things like poitns cost, squad size, weapon options etc. The new codex is alot better IMO (though like the last few books from GW, it has an annoying amount of errors )
Back on to the topic of hellhounds, I like the updated hellhound alot (both in 40K and E:A). Its now a very useful tank, and IMO will become the most common "light tank" for IG. Sort of the IG equivelant of predators.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadow Hunter
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:02 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:41 am Posts: 1747 Location: Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffs, UK
|
Well that's good news for me. For some reason I have loads of Hellhounds, and precious little else for IG.
I'm having to use some hellhounds as Chimeras so I can make an armoured co. and I still have plenty left for support.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Jimbo
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:05 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 11:01 pm Posts: 3495 Location: Wessex
|
Quote (vanvlak @ 02 2003 Dec.,10:18) | and the flame template can be 'shot' some distance away; don't have the IG codex here to confirm, though. | that is correct, it now has a 24" range
_________________ Jimbo
Felix's Gaming Pages
Felix's Gaming Pages Blog
Almost Always Right...
|
|
Top |
|
 |
iblisdrax
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:57 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:54 pm Posts: 3381 Location: First star to the right, and straight on till morning.
|
I use my hellhounds , but in epic 40k their downlfall is their slower speed vs reusses and chimeras. It might not seem like much, but reducing your armored detachment 5cm is a problem to me.
Does anyone know offhand what the speed of the hellhound is in Epic A?
iblisdrax
_________________ "Have Leman Reuss, will travel"
"Hallo. My name is Indigo Montoya. You killed my father prepare to die!"
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:09 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
E:A - both Chimera and Hellhound are 30cms, in the downloads I have ... IMO, the closer the E:A rules are to 40K is a bad thing ... 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Warmaster Nice
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:46 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:15 pm Posts: 7948 Location: Denmark
|
Yup 30 cm is correct. I think the Hellhound is supposed to be a close support tank capable of keeping up with the Infantry mechanized formations (as opposed to the slow Demolisher)
_________________ Sofa General
Nobody expects the Inquisition!!! http://theepiclounge.wordpress.com/
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 5:04 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
Yes, in keeping with the WWII type G/W fluff the Flame Tank is an Infantry CS vehicle, like the UK Crocodile, the Flame Throwing version of the Churchill Tank. Not really that effective but it did intimidate the enemy seeing them coming. The UK tankers even stencilled "Feuerwehr" on the tank to let them know ... "Burn Baby Burn !" I did the same to some of mine with old ROCO transfers. 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 5:41 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
An old saying from the '60s ! 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Jimbo
|
Post subject: Imperial Guard Hellhounds? Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 8:02 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 11:01 pm Posts: 3495 Location: Wessex
|
Quote (Legion 4 @ 02 2003 Dec.,16:04) | Yes, in keeping with the WWII type G/W fluff the Flame Tank is an Infantry CS vehicle, like the UK Crocodile, the Flame Throwing version of the Churchill Tank. ? Not really that effective but it did intimidate the enemy seeing them coming. | you'll probably like my mate Simon's Hellhounds/Crocs then

_________________ Jimbo
Felix's Gaming Pages
Felix's Gaming Pages Blog
Almost Always Right...
|
|
Top |
|
 |