Quote: (vytzka @ 16 Jul. 2009, 14:34 )
BL writers making stuff up is even more likely though!
To me if there's a conflict between BL fluff and anything, ANYTHING else, I'd go with the other option 100% of the time. Abnett is particularly bad (especially for being so famous) but everyone tends to slip up with alarming frequency.
That's G/W's standard when it comes to 40K/Epic Fluff ... Â It's like Orwellian New-speak or New-think ! Â The G/W fluff is changed, revised, altered, etc. as they go along !! Â I have not read any of the GW/BL books. Â I get my intel in W/D, here and other sites. I'm really a Hammer-phile. As many of you know. And after reading every book that been published on the Slammers, I doubt Abnett's work would come close ... And generally I think the 40K/Epic fluff is "silly" and "cartoony" among other things. And many DS, BT, etc. gamers agree ... Â However, that being said, I have 11 Epic Armies and collecting since '90 ... So I may be bi-polar or suffer from multiple personality disorder ...

 And based on the flaky GW fluff ... No one here has been able to tell me or show me what a Stormbird looks like ?

 If I was going to add Stormbirds to my CSM TO&Es ... I'd use DRM's PAX Dropship ... It may not follow the fluff ... but if any of you have noticed, the "Fluff" does not follow the "fluff" ... For my IG Colossus I used a converted BK ST Shuttle, its as close to the various versions of fluff, near as I can tell ...
