 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Fearless? |
|
Markconz
|
Post subject: Fearless?  Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:50 am |
|
| Purestrain |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
|
|
Fearless, I don't see this as being as difficult as the allocating hits problem, but here are two questions nonetheless:
1. What are you playing currently?
2. What do you think the rules for fearless units should be?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Evil and Chaos
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:56 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
|
|
Yep, Neal Hunt's mod seemed to fix that to mosts' satisfaction.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Markconz
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:52 am |
|
| Purestrain |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
|
|
Well I was also happy with it, but I was under the impression things may have developed further in some fashion. If not then that is fine.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
nealhunt
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:05 pm |
|
| Purestrain |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
|
|
That version is my personal preference. I think that if a big WE wants to take the damage and risk of a "withdraw charge" into base contact, that they should be allowed.
Greg Lane seems to prefer the alternate (total destruction within 5cm) version that completely prevents it.
_________________
Neal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Evil and Chaos
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:09 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
|
|
I havn't exploited the fearless withdrawal charge enough to comment... though it seems to me that Neal's wording would still result in the destruction of most War Engines under most circumstances (Barring some formation-edge clipping)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Ginger
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:43 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
|
|
I thought that there had been a further suggestion to the effect that Fearless are destroyed if they end their withdrawal movement in an enemy zone of control that is different to the one they started in.
So destroying any Fearless that enters an enemy ZOC, but allowing it to stay put or charge into contact if it is already in the ZOC
_________________
"Play up and play the game"
Vitai lampada
Sir Hemry Newbolt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
nealhunt
|
Post subject: Fearless? Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:33 pm |
|
| Purestrain |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
|
|
Several variations were discussed, including using ZoC. In the end it seemed the consensus was that a straight 5cm was simpler. While it's not set in stone, those are the versions the ERC is currently considering so they are the most likely to take effect.
_________________
Neal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
