Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Tau vs IG Batrep

 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:16 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (HecklerMD @ 16 Oct. 2005 (22:41))
the transport vehicle that will bring them into play

This is the operative phrase here.  

Units that are placed on the board during setup are not being "brought into play" by any units in the same formation that have transport, therefore they don't need to start in the transports.  

Units that are kept off board during setup require a means of being brought into play; usually transport flyers, hence the rule.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:48 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 6:38 am
Posts: 720
Location: Utah, pick a Pacific Island the other half of the year.
Chroma is correct "the transport vehicle that will bring them into play" is the operative phrase here, and we have had this discussion before.

Back then Jervis chimed in and clarified that this is the operative phrase and does refer to any formation that is starting off table, and then entering the table. Units that are deploying on the table are already "in play" and do not need to be loaded.

The reason for the rule is to prevent players from using a flying transport for ground attacks empty, and then loading it later. For example, without the rule my SM Thunderhawks could carry out ground attacks empty protecting the troops they will carry from danger. Then during an activation load them and bring in the troops in on, let's say, turn three.

With the rule these troops are in danger of being KIA'd if the flying transport is shot down carrying out ground attacks.

Hope this explains it better,

Jaldon :p

_________________
Brave sir Robin, when danger reared its ugly head he bravely turned his tail and fled, Brave sir Robin.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:58 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:42 am
Posts: 201
Cool.

So for run-of-the-mill ground units its players discretion: in trans or on foot?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:19 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
Good points there, guys ... always good to clarify ...  :;):

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:51 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Jaldon,

Thank you for the wonderful report. Well written, entertaining, and an enjoy to follow along - especially with the color maps! Hats off to you!

I think most have pointed out the items of question I personally would have with the report if one was trying to use it to justify the Tau's balance.

(not saying anyone here is btw!)

Unfortunately, I think the 500 point bonus to the Tau is pretty significant in Epic. If that wasn't enough, the use of FW disrupt vs. vehicles is another and possibly even bigger problem for me. Finally, I wasn't overly impressed with the choice of IG formations presented to you if he knew you were playing Tau. Savvy players should know Tau have a heck of a time with armored vehicles. Why the heck didn't he have a hydra battery?? Isn't that just staple if you are going to take a Manticore battery? Also, I see the Valkyries - but where are the vultures? Tau have limited effective offensive units against the IG armored battalion - complete no brainer to take the vultures and eliminate the HH threats early IMHO. Why he spent points on hand to hand elite infantry (what tau excel in killing) and didn't focus on more heavy hitting firepower escapes me. Tau can't fight their way out of a wet paper bag... that's ripped... putting more and more points into infantry was wasted IMHO. I would have liked to see this report played without the use of disrupt against the vehicles, something more of what i consider a *typical* tactically sound IG list locally, and an even pointed game on both sides of the field.

BTW: you are not the only one that's played an imbalanced Tau game in the Tau's favor. The Tau do much better in this mode. They can 'feel better matched' when they take more ponts. That, to me, is a sign of the list needing some much overdue attention still.

OK, one of the biggies for me - your 4th principle to exploit disrupt... well, its reduced in effectiveness against the armoured vehicles of the E:A universe IMHO. Allow me to try and explain.

Although the FAQ says you may pick vehicles formations with your formations that can not hurt them, + + + specifcially allowing you to place a blast marker for coming under fire + + +, it says _nothing_ about actually rolling to hit with AP weapons in the shooting sequence and then applying those AP hits to Armoured Vehicle targets. The book's _roll to hit_ and subsequent _hit allocation_ rules give specific order of operations in this arena. Disrupt therefore appears to work differently (to me) than perhaps you appear to be interpretting it too.

I'll try and site text and explain along the way... its late here, so forgive me if I run on a bit...


1.9.4 Place Blast Marker
The target foramtion automatically receives a Blast marker as long as at least one attcking unit can shoot at the foramtion. An additional Blast marker is received for each unit that is destroyed. A foramtion receives a Blast marker for coming under fire even if none of the attackers can cause any damage (eg. armoured vehicels coming udner heavy bolter fire).


=======> Here we establish that the book agrees with the FAQ, before actually rolling to hit or even picking which weapons you are going to fire, you check range and place blast marker for coming under fire. Note, this resloves the FAQ that was quoted earlier.


1.9.5 Roll to Hit
The player must decide at this stage whether weapons will fire with their AP or AT values if they have both. Then roll a D6 for each shot being directed a the target formation. You must roll equal to or higher than the appropriate 'to hit' value to score a hit (eg. if the weapon has an AT 4+, you must roll a 4 or more to hit). The dice roll is modified for the following reasons. However a roll of a 1 before modification is always count as a miss.


=======> This now establishes that you must _decide_ to use either _AP or AT_ weapons BEFORE rolling to hit.

1.9.6 Allocate Hits & Make Saving Throws

You must allocate hits inflicted on your formation against targets that are within range and line of fire of the enemy. Hits are allocated 'from the front to the back' of a formation. Note that this is the opposite of suppression. AP hits can _only_ be allocated against _infantry units_, and _AT hits_ may only be _allocated against armoured vehicles_. Hits may not allocate a second hit to a unit until one hit has been allocated to every potential target or allocate a third hit untial all targets have been allocated two hits, etc.
[i]

=======> Here we establish that a dice _roll to hit scored_ with an _AP weapon_ will only _allocate to an AP target_ (infantry). We also establish that AT hits _rolled_ will only _allocate to AT targets_ (armoured vehicle). Now, this section goes on to say in a second paragraph...

[i]
Once all hits have been allocated, make saving throws for each unit that has been hit, using the unit's armour value from its datasheet or the cover save from the terrain table. Roll a D6. If the score is lower than the armour value or cover save value then the unit fails its save, and is destroyed and removed from play. If the roll is equal to or greater than the armour or cover save value then the unit is saved and it remains in play. Make a seperate save for each hit the unit suffers. Remember that the target formation receives a Blast marker for each unit that is destroyed.


=======> Here we establish that saves are now taken by all hits allocated to the various unit types. We also note that we make a seperate save for each hit the unit suffers.


Page 38, 2.2.2 Disrupt
Certain weapons are designed to disrupt enemy formations as much as kill enemy troops. to represent this weapons noted as having the disrupt ability inflict a Blast marker on an enemy formation for each _hit_ they inflict instead of for each kill they inflict. Note that the _hits inflicted_ by disruptor weapons _are saved_ for normally. Any units that fail their save are removed as casualties but do not cause a second blast marker to be placed on the target formation.


=====> Here we establish that disrupt only works for "hits" inflicted to the enemy formation.

=====> If the enemy formation has all armored vehicles, then one could not fire AP weapons with disrupt at the enemy formation and hope for anything other than 'coming under fire' blast marker as per the FAQ. A successful _dice_ rolled to hit such as from an AP only weapon fire with disrupt, such as Firewarriors, would never get _allocated_ to an all vehicle formation. No _allocation_ is no _hits inflicted_ on the enemy formation. No hits inflicted means no saves to make, or no saves to be "taken as normal." Therefore, there is only a hit rolled... not allocated or inflicted. You cannot inflict what you cannot allocate. Disrupt therefore only works if you can actually allocate something to the enemy units in the enemy formation.

Man... **if** I could fire disrupt AP and break enemy armoured vehicle formations... Wow... I'd use my Manticores in my IG list all day long as AP fire just to get the extra plus one on sustained fire... 3+ disrupt AP to armored vehicle formations - whoo-hoo!! Who cares if I don't hurt you, blast marker disrupt with 3+ is good stuff   :alien:

Anyway, just my understanding of things. I do look forward to your next two reports!

Off to bed now...  :zzz:

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:17 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:34 am
Posts: 481
Quote (Tactica @ 18 Oct. 2005 (06:51))
If that wasn't enough, the use of FW disrupt vs. vehicles is another and possibly even bigger problem for me.

Actually, the disrupt didn't matter in breaking the 3rd on turn 2. Do the numbers. The 3rd would've broken either way.

Still, including infantry targets in a tank company is just dumb from the PoV of avoiding blast markers. They are easy pickings for a number of weapons systems and will just drag the tanks down when they die and generate BMs.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:27 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:34 am
Posts: 481
Quote (baronpiero @ 15 Oct. 2005 (20:42))
The map reveals that you seem to use a lot less cover areas than we do.

Jaldon's map looks like 4'x6'. It has 12 terrain features -- exactly the number prescribed by the Epic:A Tournament Terrain guidelines (rules, 6.1).

We use more terrain as well. Generally, we have something like 8 small patches of woods, some patches of rough terrain, 3 or so built-up areas, around 5 hills and some extras. Check out Crossfire (IanH's Crossfire page) for an interesting take on terrain.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:55 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Asura,

Agreed on the actual game results.

I was tired so I'm sure my response was rather muttled in meaning.

My point was exactly as you've described, mixing infantry into the tank co was a bad play by the adversary. A problematic list build with lessor points is already recipe for disaster in my neck of the woods.

The critique of disrupt vs. vehicle formations was more in line with his Way of the Tau principle number 4. I was more challenging the principle in context to what I see as typical Epic:A armies and what I would have expected the Steel legion player to field had he been one of our power gamers locally.

..Ehem... :/

Anyway, I don't want to lose the fact that I really enjoyed his batrep and was inspired by its detail. My critique was simply a talking point. I found their method of documenting battles interesting.

We use a laptop digital pictures for documenting our games. That was really the first time I heard about how others deal with the documenting of a batrep task. (no small feat IMHO)

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:22 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 6:38 am
Posts: 720
Location: Utah, pick a Pacific Island the other half of the year.
Thanks for the compliments on the layout of the batrep guys, ask Neal I have been doing them this way for a very long time now.

Oh Jaldon look over to your left there are some new smilies there :zzz:

Anyways, the Tanks would have been attacked by Battlesuits, Hammerheads, and Warriors to increase their AT firepower IF the infantry hadn't been attached to the 3rd Company. (We have never used Tau disrupt weapons against tanks, I worded my reply to Neal very poorly, and should have stated my position more clearly as conjecture because of the rule quoted.) Just why would I throw an AP heavy CFA at tanks when I had the needed AT firepower buried in Battlesuits, Hammerheads, and Devilfish. Look closer the list has AT firepower all over the place.

We do not believe that a good playtest of an army is to allow someone to powergame, so for our batreps we avoid it in various ways.

For this series of three reports my army was built to face Chaos, and is now being used to fight IG, Eldar, and Ork Horde this effectively puts me "In the Box", as we like to call it, and prevents me from power building a list to beat the army gone up against.

In J.D.s case, and the next two, they are told to build a list to a specified number of points not knowing who, or what, they will be facing. Once they turn the list in they are then told. So they are also in the box and cannot power build a list for the army they are going to face, they must build a generic list as they would if they were going to a tournament.

Saying J.D. should have taken this or that, or not put infantry in his Tank Company is conjecture based on 20-20 hindsight, J.D. had no idea what army he would be facing until after he'd turned in his list. Also assuming a list is poor because you didn't like the players force selection is also conjecture.

The two Tau players locally, me and Roger, I cannot use Kroot to save my life and IMHO they are next to worthless, yet Roger fields them regularly and they do well for him. Different strokes for different folks. (Does that include having 500 more pts then your opponent Jaldon, hmmmmmmmmm :oops: )

In anycase, the Eldar opponent was Jack, who has been playing Eldar since the first Eldar playtest list came out, and no insult intended, he is not as green as J.D. (And no I am not going to give any hints as to what happened :p )

Thanks Again for the compliment, and do not forget to thank CyberShadow for providing the URL so I could put them right in with the report.

Jaldon :p

_________________
Brave sir Robin, when danger reared its ugly head he bravely turned his tail and fled, Brave sir Robin.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:26 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Isn't it about time to end the suspense and show us what happened in the next battle. :)

Or are the Tau Water Caste still putting the spin on a defeat. :p


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:42 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
He let the proverbial 'cat out of the bag' in another thread already.

(Hmm... no pun or offense intended pet lovers)  :alien:

I'll let thos interested go search for it if you must know.  Don't want to ruin it for those being patient... or make it easy for you. :devil:

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Tau vs IG Batrep
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:05 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Quote (clausewitz @ 26 Oct. 2005 (08:26))
Isn't it about time to end the suspense and show us what happened in the next battle. :)

Or are the Tau Water Caste still putting the spin on a defeat. :p

Hi!

I second this.  :8):

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net