Quote: (The_Real_Chris @ 27 Jun. 2009, 05:14 )
Quote: (Legion 4 @ 27 Jun. 2009, 05:05 )
Yes, he based the M9 CBT CAR on the M113 ACAV(ah ... my Beloved M113 !) ... The 11th ACR in which he served in, the ACAV was one of their most numerous AFVs in the TO&E.  The MBTs in the 11th at that time were M48s ...  And as we know the M113 was not renowned for it's survivability ... ÂÂ
Yes I was shocked by 'my Beloved M113 !)' until I got to 'And as we know the M113 was not renowned for it's survivability' and realised you must be exercising your irony

Ironically the Rhino is awful in Epic as well
O-man ... no matter what she's called ... I want some !! And yes TRC ... the M113 is vulnerable from many evils ... The best armor is the front hull because the engine will stop most projectiles that penetrate, but then the M113 is immobile, and will probably catch on fire and/or explode. The sides are flat so even heavy MG rounds will penetrate and bounce around inside the troop compartment. A very bad thing ... Sometimes I'd have my company sandbag the front hulls and tops. As well as sandbag the floor inside the troop compartment ... We learned from 'Nam, in many cases, it was safer to ride on the top outside, then inside the troop hold. As the M113 was also vulnerable to mines & explosive booby traps ...

But generally speaking, the armor would stop almost all HE frags from FA and Mortars !

But I would not want to be inside if 152mm rounds landed withing 50 yards of the hull ...

But otherwise I was happy to command an M113 Mech Inf Co., and serve in two other Mech Bns ...

So I'm sure the Rhino suffers from similar "evils" ... In SM1, the Rhino got a -1 to it's Armor Rating to reflect this, I'm assuming ... ( Sorry to hijack your thread O-man ... but ya know I luvs ya ! )
