Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Dragonfish initiative?

 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:19 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Is the intention for the Dragonfish NOT to have initiative 1+ an oversight or is that the general consensus? It seems odd to have the Shas'o in one formation with 1+ while another has 2+.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:30 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:44 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
Well, I'd like to see it have a +1

_________________
Honda

"Remember Taros? We do"

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 4:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Dobbsy & Honda,

If something 'seems wrong', its worth looking at but usually there's a root problem if something's not right...

First and foremost on my mind - does it need it for rules / game balance?

Second, are you avoiding taking it due to the 2+ init when your SC could have 1+ init?

Elaborate on your thoughts a bit if you don't mind.

Cheers,

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 5:06 pm 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore
To be honest, this is an oversight - due to the upgrading of the Crisis Cadre, and missing the Dragonfish. My gut reaction is that it should be 1+, but Tacticas points still stand.

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 5:54 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
This is a bit more of a gray area, as the Dragonfish is actually an upgrade to the Scorpionfish formation (which is initiative 2+, and should be so).

I don't think there is any other formation in any army that gets an initiative change from an upgrade unit.

I'm not opposed to the Dragonfish having initiative 1+, but it'll need to be carefully worded in the army list.  Over to you CyberShadow :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:22 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm
Posts: 606
Quote (clausewitz @ 25 Jan. 2006 (16:54))
I don't think there is any other formation in any army that gets an initiative change from an upgrade unit.

Black guardians from Ulthwe? 1/3 guardian warhosts have free black guardian upgrade which gives them 1+ initiave.

_________________
www.tneva.net


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (tneva82 @ 25 Jan. 2006 (17:22))
Quote (clausewitz @ 25 Jan. 2006 (16:54))
I don't think there is any other formation in any army that gets an initiative change from an upgrade unit.

Black guardians from Ulthwe? 1/3 guardian warhosts have free black guardian upgrade which gives them 1+ initiave.

Black Guardians are now their own seperate formation with different options and upgrades, not an upgrade to the base Guardian Warhost.

The only reason I see the Dragonfish having 2+ Init, is that the Shas'O is slightly more busy onboard than jumping around in a Crisis suit...  :D

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:11 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 423
Location: Duisburg , Germany
Quote (Chroma @ 25 Jan. 2006 (18:41))
Quote (tneva82 @ 25 Jan. 2006 (17:22))
Quote (clausewitz @ 25 Jan. 2006 (16:54))
I don't think there is any other formation in any army that gets an initiative change from an upgrade unit.

Black guardians from Ulthwe? 1/3 guardian warhosts have free black guardian upgrade which gives them 1+ initiave.

Black Guardians are now their own seperate formation with different options and upgrades, not an upgrade to the base Guardian Warhost.

The only reason I see the Dragonfish having 2+ Init, is that the Shas'O is slightly more busy onboard than jumping around in a Crisis suit... ?:D

Why should he be more busy? In the Dragonfish he might have ample Input from the Battlefield on several screens , but the work should remain the same. He might command just without worrying about beeing shot at while jumping, and the Dragonfish should offer more protection.
EDIT: But still, if you think that only a Commander in a Battlesuit should have Ini 1+ , then so be it.
Steele





_________________
Quid pro Quo


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:50 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (Steele @ 25 Jan. 2006 (20:11))
EDIT: But still, if you think that only a Commander in a Battlesuit should have Ini 1+ , then so be it.
Steele

It's not the Shas'O who has 1+ Initiative, it's Battlesuit Cadres!  Any upgrades you add to that cadre will also be going at a 1+, regardless of what they are, it's got nothing to do with a Tau commander's presence.

The Dragonfish is just slightly slower to act than Battlesuits, that's all the difference in initiative means and I think it makes sense.

Crisis Suits are there to be rapid first-responders to a crisis, hence their improved initiative, that is all.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:34 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:44 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas


Elaborate on your thoughts a bit if you don't mind.



+1 iz bedder dan +2, purty simpel

:/

I was just thinking from a CF perspective, that it would be more effective.

_________________
Honda

"Remember Taros? We do"

- 23rd Elysian Drop Regiment


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 4:38 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:42 am
Posts: 201
IMHO, a Stealth Contingent is more justified in 1+ init than the bigFish(s), as they are as "elite" as the Crisis Pilots, if not moreso.  SpecOps Battlesuits and such.

Its not linked to the commander.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:38 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 423
Location: Duisburg , Germany
Quote (Chroma @ 25 Jan. 2006 (21:50))
Quote (Steele @ 25 Jan. 2006 (20:11))
EDIT: But still, if you think that only a Commander in a Battlesuit should have Ini 1+ , then so be it.
Steele

It's not the Shas'O who has 1+ Initiative, it's Battlesuit Cadres! ?Any upgrades you add to that cadre will also be going at a 1+, regardless of what they are, it's got nothing to do with a Tau commander's presence.

The Dragonfish is just slightly slower to act than Battlesuits, that's all the difference in initiative means and I think it makes sense.

Crisis Suits are there to be rapid first-responders to a crisis, hence their improved initiative, that is all.

Yes I now that , and by chance the SC could have it too, so why not giving it the 1+ ? If the Command Array is destroyed it?s no longer a SC and therefore may revert to 2+. How does it sounds?

Cheers!
Steele

_________________
Quid pro Quo


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:39 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 423
Location: Duisburg , Germany
Quote (HecklerMD @ 26 Jan. 2006 (04:38))
IMHO, a Stealth Contingent is more justified in 1+ init than the bigFish(s), as they are as "elite" as the Crisis Pilots, if not moreso. ?SpecOps Battlesuits and such.

Its not linked to the commander.

At first I thought that all BATTLESUITS would get 1+.  :down:

_________________
Quid pro Quo


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote (Tactica @ 25 Jan. 2006 (15:44))
Dobbsy & Honda,

If something 'seems wrong', its worth looking at but usually there's a root problem if something's not right...

First and foremost on my mind - does it need it for rules / game balance?

Second, are you avoiding taking it due to the 2+ init when your SC could have 1+ init?

Elaborate on your thoughts a bit if you don't mind.

Cheers,

Sorry Tac' I originally just wanted to ask the question about this for clarification either way, hence my not elaborating... :blush: But...

Firstly - I have yet to use it but am seriously looking at it but I would say that a 1+ SC is vital for the Tau list as it stands as they take a lot of BMs and IMO it's needed to compensate for the lists inability in assault.

Secondly - Yes, I would avoid taking it with a 2+ initiative

My reason is that why would I want a 2+ Initiative Supreme Commander? It seriously hampers Tau battelfield ability. I know first hand that it reduces the Tau effort in-game when you have an SC with a 2+.






Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Dragonfish initiative?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:51 am 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore
The option that I am favouring currently is making the increased initiative a part of the Tau Supreme Commander special rule. This should apply it to all commanders (Dragonfish and Shas'O) and keep the rule specific and simple. I agree that it is a good idea to add it to these two units, but I think that making all battlesuits 1+ initiative would be going a little too far.

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net