Abetillo wrote:
IJW Wartrader wrote:
Roughly speaking,
40k Gorkamorkanauts = Epic Stompas.
40k Stompas = Epic Supa Stompas or even Slasha Gargants (they're roughly in between the two).
It depends on what you use as comparison. Using wh40k Warhounds and Epic ones ...
Background wise, more or less: they use Gargants' with a mix of pieces of Mekboy Gargant/Supa-Stompa background, but it is also because they treat it like they don't build anything bigger than wh40k Stompas.
Rules-wise, they are around as tough as wh40k un-shielded Warhounds or a bit less, depending on the book. Weapon-wise, they look like Supa-Stompas or bit up-gunned.
Size, wise, no way.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-knwWORZM8yk/U ... C_0001.JPGUsing Epic and Wh40k Warhounds as reference they are quite smaller than Supa-Stompas. I would say that they are a bit bigger than EA metal Stompas, a bit taller but have a bit less in width and depth.
Size wise using the Warhounds as reference i would say that EA Stompas are between Gorkamorkanauts and wh40k Stompas.
I'm mainly using the Baneblade as a baseline, because it's the most consistent superheavy across different editions of Epic and 40k.
I specifically left Warhounds out if it, because the relative power level/toughness of Imperial Titans has roughly doubled in recent years.
In current 40k, a Stompa is about 50% tougher than a Baneblade, and an unshielded Warhound is about 50% tougher than a Stompa and a bit more than twice as tough as a Baneblade. Unlike EA, where an unshielded Warhound is substantially
less tough than a Baneblade.