Skitarii 2.05 (Approved Candidate version) |
Mrdiealot
|
Post subject: Re: Skitarii 2.05 (Approved Candidate version) Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:46 am |
|
Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 8:07 pm Posts: 731 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
What was it in the list that ERC objected to?
_________________ AC for Traitor Titan Legion and Hive Fleet Dagon
|
|
Top |
|
|
Vaaish
|
Post subject: Re: Skitarii 2.05 (Approved Candidate version) Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:03 pm |
|
Hybrid |
|
|
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 4234 Location: Greenville, SC
|
I'm seeking additional clarification on specifics but some concerns that I was ignoring complaints with the list, theme wasn't overtly offensive or defensive and a desire to see it one or the other. Core formations too rigid, expensive upgrades and lack of variety with support formations.
Specific suggestions were to add a more shooty formation if the list is defensive or give the list cheaper and faster transports for offensive.
I can agree that the list is slow unless you take some expensive options and you have a lot of fairly expensive formations. My goal would be to see the list act a bit like a moving trenchline with a slow methoical advance. The access to titan grade weapons is supposed to help mitigate the slow movement with the range and firepower, but the current point values aren't reinforcing that so the first step would be to drop costs to encourage more heavy weapons on the field. Ideally I'd see more minorus in demicenturies and Sagitarii.
I'm not certain where that would be for the core and support formations. I've always found them to to pretty reasonably priced for their performace myself. I mean we could potentially drop 25 points off both the robots and maybe tweak the cost of the demicentruy. Another potential change would be to add in fearless on the ordinatus since that can be a touch squishy.
_________________ -Vaaish
|
|
Top |
|
|