(Ginger @ May 26 2008,22:22)
QUOTE
Am working on the entire list - will update the championship shortly. But also think I noticed a discrepancy in the scoring for rounds 3&4.
And I don't understand the painting scores at all - 3x 37, 3x 35, 6x 34, 1x 30 and my sympathies Andy. Because there are 0.5 points missing from three scores and the other discrepancies, I just think your score got omitted in error - but with even 34 points, you would have got 4th.
I'm fairly sure both rob lane and andy's scores are mistakes.
The system used seemed to be a checklist were you got 25pts for having a painted army (sure andy had this when he and I were discussing the harsh marking of his list).
After that you got +3pts for basing, coherency, something else I cant remember, high quality and then very high quality.
Giving possible scores of 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40
No army got the very high quality score (but it is apparently reserved for a very few armies in the whole tourni)
So where 0, 30 or even 35 came from only the mysterious inner workings of the WPS will know.
Thinking about it maybe you got a -2 for having an army not entirely painted by yourself which would only leave the mystery of rob's 30 - assuming andy's score was just a mistake in not entering his base 25pts