Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

[NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010

 Post subject: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:57 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Greetings from the NetERC and the NetEA Project!

Please find attached the 2010 Draft of the Imperial Navy section of the NetEA Army Book. Please examine this document for typos, inconsistencies, and unclearness, or any other issues you may feel need to be resolved before final release.
Thank you!


This section includes the following armies:

No armies at all! Only Imperial Navy Allies units.


Attachments:
2010 - NetEA-ArmyCompendiumS1.3 - Imperial Navy.pdf [43.6 KiB]
Downloaded 514 times

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:34 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 720
Location: Agri-World-NZ77
Maybe the empty experimental section should have the text '[Empty]'.

_________________
Uti possidetis, ita possideatis.
May your beer be laid under an enchantment of surpassing excellence for seven years!
An online epic force creator:
Armyforge


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:22 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Where did the lightning stats come from? Must say highly unimpressed doesn't fully sum up my response.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
The_Real_Chris wrote:
Where did the lightning stats come from? Must say highly unimpressed doesn't fully sum up my response.

The Elysian's list, the only list that I'm aware they're in.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20886
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
They're in the Sisters of Battle list too IIRC?

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Evil and Chaos wrote:
They're in the Sisters of Battle list too IIRC?

Which hasn't been submitted to me so I haven't looked at it; how do the stats differ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20886
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Can't remember, ask Zombo.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:48 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:40 pm
Posts: 2842
Location: Netherlands
Call it Imperial Battleship and Imperial Cruiser.
Ditch the class names. It doesn't do justice to BFG. ;)

_________________
Light at the Horizon.

Warp Rift
Project Distant Darkness
Eldar MMS

GothiComp Hall of Fame
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=19176


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:28 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
Chroma wrote:
Evil and Chaos wrote:
They're in the Sisters of Battle list too IIRC?

Which hasn't been submitted to me so I haven't looked at it; how do the stats differ?


Code:
Imperial Navy Lightning Fighter
Type      Speed    Armour     Close Combat    Firefight
Aircraft  Fighter     -       N/A             N/A
Weapon                     Range     Firepower            Notes
Long Barreled Autocannon   45cm      AP5+/AT6+/AA6+       Fixed Forward Arc
Twin Lascannon             30cm      AT4+/AA4+            Fixed Forward Arc


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:17 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:32 pm
Posts: 2455
Location: Cardiff, wales
"Such formations use the Strategy Rating and other special rules of the army they are allied with."

Most lists I've seen specify the stratergy rating of allied formations as well as the main armies (and they're often different)

could the wording of the 2nd part of the sentence cause confusion? I'm not aware of any Imperial lists with army wide special rules, but for future prooofing?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:40 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
madd0ct0r wrote:
"Such formations use the Strategy Rating and other special rules of the army they are allied with."

Most lists I've seen specify the stratergy rating of allied formations as well as the main armies (and they're often different)

No army has different Strategy Ratings for different formations, not sure how that would even make sense; there are differing Initiative values which are, or should be, specified on an army by army basis, that's what the rule is indicating.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:44 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
The Armageddon Steel Legion PDF also uses both Lightnings. I took the stats from the Elysians.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:16 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
BlackLegion wrote:
The Armageddon Steel Legion PDF also uses both Lightnings. I took the stats from the Elysians.

Anyone know who actually wrote the various stats for the Lightnings?

T_R_C, you expressed disappointment in the stats, what do you think they should be like?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:30 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20886
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Chroma wrote:
BlackLegion wrote:
The Armageddon Steel Legion PDF also uses both Lightnings. I took the stats from the Elysians.

Anyone know who actually wrote the various stats for the Lightnings?


Zombo wrote his own for the Sisters list, as the stats in the Elysian list deviate somewhat by making up new weapon names/types I guess.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: [NetEA] Imperial Navy Section - DRAFT 2010
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Chroma wrote:
BlackLegion wrote:
The Armageddon Steel Legion PDF also uses both Lightnings. I took the stats from the Elysians.

Anyone know who actually wrote the various stats for the Lightnings?


Zombo wrote his own for the Sisters list, as the stats in the Elysian list deviate somewhat by making up new weapon names/types I guess.


That, and as TRC said, the Elysian versions are rubbish. I also made them have no save as they're supposed to be much more lightly armoured than thunderbolts.

I really like the stats I came up with, as they provide an excellent interceptor that's relatively weak on ground attack, much as they should be.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net