Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

[NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=19863		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Chroma [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Greetings from the NetERC and the NetEA Project!

Please find attached the 2010 Draft of the Ork Army section of the NetEA Army Book. Please examine this document for typos, inconsistencies, and unclearness, or any other issues you may feel need to be resolved before final release.
Thank you!


This section includes the following armies:

GHAZGKHULL MAG URUK THRAKA’S WAR HORDE ORK ARMY - APPROVED

BURNING DEATH SPEED FREEKS ORK ARMY - APPROVED

WARLORD SNAGGA-SNAGGA’S FERAL ORK HORDE - APPROVED

ORKAMEDIES’S GARGANT BIGMOB ORK ARMY - IN DEVELOPMENT

BLOOD AXE KOMMANDANT UG SKRAAGA MORKRUMP’S KORPS ORK ARMY - IN DEVELOPMENT

KOLONEL ROMMELZ'S BLOOD AXE MERCENARY ORK WAR HORDE - IN DEVELOPMENT


If there are lists you feel have been missed, please feel free to contact myself, NealHunt, or any other members of the NetERC.

Attachments:
2010 - NetEA-ArmyCompendiumS1.6 - Orks.pdf [218.41 KiB]
Downloaded 2981 times
Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Free Plantfall and Self-Planetfall are the same right? So why the different names on the Drop Kan and Drop Rok??

Also Drop Rok and Grotnought Notes aren't Italicized.
Author:  nealhunt [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
AoC: Yes. Same ability. We changed the name at some point.

Chroma: Ack. Missed the Drop Kanz. Drop Kanz aren't self-planetfall. They are just drop pods, without the deathwind attack, so they need a spacecraft.
Author:  Morgan Vening [ Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Also, Landa mentions Attack Bikes and Buggies. Doesn't mention Warbikes or Warbuggy/Wartrak.

Also, it doesn't mention Nob Warbikes. And while it might be 'obvious' to some that Warbike includes Nob Warbike, there was a lengthy discussion on whether Bike meant Attack Bike, in the Marine list.

Morgan Vening
Author:  BlackLegion [ Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Gunfortress' and Battlefortress' Big Guns should bet AP5+/AT5+ NOT AP5+/AT6+
Author:  Evil and Chaos [ Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Supa Stompa price typo?
Author:  nealhunt [ Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
No. We made it 275 years ago.
Author:  Evil and Chaos [ Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Ah, I had a vague memory of that, thus the question mark rather than the statement, couldn't be certain though. :)
Author:  spaint2k [ Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Is there any reason that the base formation of Madboyz is now only five units instead of six? I couldn't find any posts anywhere discussing this except this one: viewtopic.php?f=83&t=16754 in which it seemed to be the general consensus that the Madboyz were okay the way they were...

Also (and I realize that this change has been around for a while), why were Boarboyz reduced to a 20cm move (from 25cm) when the Feral Orks is an army that is generally acknowledged to be horrendously slow-moving? Any pointers to that discussion would also be appreciated.

Cheers,
Steve
Author:  Dave [ Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
First one is most likely a typo.

If I had to take a guess on the Boarboys I would say because they're infiltrators as well.
Author:  Tiny-Tim [ Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Well spotted. Yes the list should have 6 Madboyz as the bas e formation.

Dave is correct, Boarboyz were dropped to 20cm due to the overal range of their engagment moves, 50cm charges were too good.
Author:  wargame_insomniac [ Sun Sep 11, 2011 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Is there anywhere a list of all the changes made to points/stats for Ghazkhull Mag Uruk Thraka's war horde as compared to EA rulebook? Just trying to get my head around them.

Thanks

James
Author:  BlackLegion [ Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
CC and FF values of the Ork Landa are switched.
Author:  Tiny-Tim [ Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Feral Orks - Wildboyz the CC & FF stats in the compendium are the wrong way around CC 4+, FF 6+ are the correct way.
Author:  sethanon [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Orks Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Was brought up in this http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=23590however, for me (with an upcoming tournament) clarification/updating of the Landa Rokkit characteristics.

Landa has 2 x Tankbusta Rokkits @ AT4+?

The Landa in the 2010 Draft Ork PDF available in the OP and the NetEA compendium does not correlate with the thread or the NetEA Tournament Pack Ork Forces list.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/