LordotMilk wrote:
Better for a tournament environment does not mean that more colourful lists are bad for tournaments.
No it doesn't.
Quote:
No one will argue that Chess isn't easier to manage for tournaments than Magic:the Gathering, for example.
I've no idea what this has to do with list dvelopment.
Quote:
A good example of my point is the treatment DKoK (which you seem to have fondness for) received. I like Centaurs and Trojans, and I do not think they are unbalanced in the NetEA list. EUk streamlined these units into one. That's fine balance wise, makes it easier to manage. I would not support it as a change on the NetEA list.
That should only be a problem for you if you were to come to an Epic-UK event. You are free to use any list you like and I reiterate you can even take an E-UK list and change whatever you dislike to whatever you do like.
Even if NetEA wanted to make that change you could just change it back if you prefer.
YOUR ALLOWED TO DO THAT, IT'S STATED IN THE RULE BOOK.
Quote:
Note that I'd rather we didnt discuss EUK lists here. My point was that I wish that if NetEA redesigns LatD (or an offshoot) then we tackle the matter in a straightforward and open manner, and we don't limit ourselves to a simple rince and streamlining of the existing list, which I had pointed out as being a typical EUk process (note that this is stated principle of EUk development, as written in the design notes of your codexes).
Then don't bring them up, simples tchh.
The list is in the NetEA section but as you have already been told it is not replacing the original list or re-designing it ,it is possibly an off-shoot list. So why should things be changed in this list for it to be full of different stats to it's parent list.
