Seems fine - yet it would be good to see it in a proposal rather than a generalisation.
For its simplicity, it looks fine and allows Cult specific lists to stray from this and be different which is something that I definitely support
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Structure http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=17518 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Steve54 [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
While this is not included in the previous proposals a number of people have contacted me suggesting it and its something that is an interesting idea. Implement a core/support structure for the BL - which will eliminate the non-scaleable o-x restrictions. CORE Retinues ELITE SUPPORT 0-1 per core Terminators Chosen (scouts) Defilers GENERAL SUPPORT 0-2 per core Bikes Raptors Armoured Co |
|
| Author: | frogbear [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Seems fine - yet it would be good to see it in a proposal rather than a generalisation. For its simplicity, it looks fine and allows Cult specific lists to stray from this and be different which is something that I definitely support
|
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Have you had a look Steve at how it would have impacted past competitive lists? |
|
| Author: | Man of kent [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
As TRC says: how would this affect people's current lists? R> |
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
I've put it against my most common list retinue - terminators - bikes retinue - chosen - raptors Which would be still legal However the list I took to London retinue - terminators - bikes - chosen - raptors - chosen Would obviously have been affected - which was a 4 WE list I'll trawl though the other later today |
|
| Author: | Mephiston [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
As part of the assault company I thought they have moved to the 1/3rd limit so have to fight with ferals and wheels? |
|
| Author: | yme-loc [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Its a reasonable idea - wouldnt just two support for one core be simpler and easier though. |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
In the Red Corsairs list it was mentioned that 1Core-2Support was to restrictive. Red Corsairs have 1:3 Core = Retinue, Terminators, Bikes Support = Everything else Titans and Aircrafts separate as 1/3 allowance |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
I like it.
|
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Quote: (Hena @ Dec. 27 2009, 14:01 ) Since you haven't opened thread on Decimator, I'm a bit worried about the spamming of them with MW and IC with the structure of above. Why when its part of the titan allocation? |
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Quote: (yme-loc @ Dec. 27 2009, 17:15 ) Its a reasonable idea - wouldnt just two support for one core be simpler and easier though. It would be simpler - but I'm concerned about the 'elite' formations being 2 per core. Scouts work well as 0-1 per retinue at the moment, and large numbers of terminators might be a issue also. |
|
| Author: | GlynG [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Proposed structure looks good Hopefully the list changes will cut down a bit on the warmachine-spam chaos lists too.
|
|
| Author: | bluemonkey [ Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Structure |
Sounds like a good idea. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|