uvenlord wrote:
Oh, sorry my fault then I counted both MW and TK as AT (anti tank) but still.
I was thinking about the Leman russes and the ordinatus mainly, but also Shadowsword, the Leviathan and to some degree the airforce and all the Kasrkin.
Fun to see someone else who is actually playing.
How do your build look like?
Would it be worth to sacrifice the artillery for some vultures?
I see my lovely Russes as MBTs, not really AT units but they have some punch (after all, they're not LR Tank Destroyers, nor Rapiers, etc, etc... I mean, actual AT units).
The Leviathan has some serious AT
, what a pity it's soooo slow, right? I don't have any Orninatus and I don't like plasma anyway (also soooooo slow
). I usually use a lot of airforce with Cadia for supporting my ground grunts, but again it's mainly an AP or mixed asset.
I either use the typical configuration with SC+Leviathan, or I go to the battlefield with no SC and spam lots of Kasrkin fms giving me plenty of support slots for tanks and artillery. I would say Kasrkins are ace assault troops, but no actual AT whatsoever (unless the enemy is in CC range - enemy tanks aren't that bad in FFs).
And choosing between artillery and Vultures would be so painful: I love both, my favorite units together with Russes. With artillery the army would be slow as it is, exchanging them for Vultures would dramatically improve the overall speed of the army, but then no siege feel at all.
_________________
Epic Armageddon in Spanish (from Spain):
http://www.box.net/shared/3u5vr8a370Konig Armoured Regiment FanList:
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 41#p581941