(Legion 4 @ Jun. 13 2007,13:05)
QUOTE
Well, if you've been in the military (USN or USAF ?), and it sounds like you have, I'm sure you may have seen the square chutes that are much more maneuverable then the standard T-10 and MC1-1B, I've jumped both.

? O.K. Back OT - As far as the Market Garden scenario, that would be a good option (but it wasn't for the UK & Pole Paras!), but I think they want to keep this TO&E "pure" Ely ...
Legion I've never been in the military but one of my university degrees is in history. Is that good enough?
I understand the HALO parachuting thingamajig lingo now.
Mark as for the sentinals, they are as you know a really weak unit and if someone wants to waste points more than two formations of them I say let them. I'd rather verse lots of sentinals than valks and vults.
The big key to this list I feel is somehow limiting the effectiveness of the valks and maybe the vults since you'll have quite a few at your disposal compared to a regular guard list. The valks are the big ones however. With Mark's stormtrooper option, you can still feasibly take two plus storm trooper + valk formations in addition to the raw drop companies to fill out the core choice. I'm still in the opinion that the valks and vults should remain seperate for this list and therefore remain very vunerable than if they were surrounded by a meat shield, oops, i mean guard.