Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Urgent! SL changes

 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Mephiston wrote:
Maybe not but even at 100 they are competing with sentinels.... scout, can capture objectives...sentinels win!

Then there's zero reason not to drop the price of the cruiser to 100pts, and the battleship upgrade to ~75pts.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:24 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
Or look at their stat's to make them interesting? Just a thought.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:31 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Mephiston wrote:
Or look at their stat's to make them interesting? Just a thought.....

For a 300pt Emperor Battleship, I'd want a fair sized nuclear bomb. :-)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 7:26 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Mephiston wrote:
Or look at their stat's to make them interesting? Just a thought.....

For a 300pt Emperor Battleship, I'd want a fair sized nuclear bomb. :-)

Maybe we can roll the Emperor BB across the gaming table and remoce as casualties any models that it knocks over?

On a more serious note I would take spacecraft at the moment- I am not convinced they can justify their current points costs. So if they were cheaper i would be more likely to take them.

Cheers

James


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:44 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:43 pm
Posts: 2556
Location: UK
Tbolts: no, the SM change is because of SR5.

Warlord: hard to call, these size titans are not going to be common in tournament-size points armies, how will you know you've reached the right price? 825, 800, 775?

Spacecraft: good idea to move them to 1/3, not sure they're as bad as people say I just don't take them because I can't fit them in and generally like to have models on the board. The Lunar has a Shadowsword shot anywhere on the board and the orbital barrage (similar value as the pinpoint attack?). Compared to the Shadowsword and Deathstrikes at 200 (both have more shots/power on average, but can be countered and are 1/3 more expensive), I think it is very close. Maybe a reduction for the battleship.

_________________
Kyrt's Battle Result Tracker (forum post is here)
Kyrt's trade list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:02 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:14 am
Posts: 3416
Location: Western Australia
Kyrt wrote:
Tbolts: no, the SM change is because of SR5.

Warlord: hard to call, these size titans are not going to be common in tournament-size points armies, how will you know you've reached the right price? 825, 800, 775?

Spacecraft: good idea to move them to 1/3, not sure they're as bad as people say I just don't take them because I can't fit them in and generally like to have models on the board. The Lunar has a Shadowsword shot anywhere on the board and the orbital barrage (similar value as the pinpoint attack?). Compared to the Shadowsword and Deathstrikes at 200 (both have more shots/power on average, but can be countered and are 1/3 more expensive), I think it is very close. Maybe a reduction for the battleship.

I pretty much agree with Kyrt.

T/bolts don't need to change.
Whether a Warlord is 850 or 825 points, really doesn't make a difference so I say leave it as is.
I can certainly see a reduction for the battleship. Going to the 1/3 allies may help to see a few more ships being used which I reckon is good.

_________________
Just call me Steve.

NetEA Rules Chair
NetEA FAQ

Want to play Iron Warriors in Epic Armageddon? Click HERE
Some of my Armies.
My Hobby site.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:04 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Rug wrote:
Thoughts appreciated on the following:

If Warlords go to 825pts & T-Bolts to 175pts in the Codex Marines list, should SL follow suit?

Should the Spacecraft be moved into the Allies section where, arguably, it belongs? Along with some points changes this might make them more attractive.

If the costs changes are approved and accepted by the ERC then it should automatically follow suit in all Imperial lists as there the same EXACT units.

However I don't think T-Bolts need any changing at all. Warlords might be alright but I don't think 25 points is enough difference to be noticeable.

_________________
My NetEA Lists:
Fir Iolarion Titan Clan List
Dark Angels List

Always looking to Trade!
Angel's Trade Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 6:12 am
Posts: 1331
Location: Australia
but they're not the exact same unit
yes, their written stats are the same, but there are other stats, shown on the army list, which differ. one of them is Strategy Rating
the other, is Price.

_________________
~Every Tool Is A Weapon, If You Hold It Right~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:53 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Angel_of_Caliban wrote:
If the costs changes are approved and accepted by the ERC then it should automatically follow suit in all Imperial lists as there the same EXACT units.

:D :D <head shaking emote> :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:30 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:15 am
Posts: 1832
Location: Oslo, Norway
And even if the SR was the same, that still doesn't mean the price has to be the same.

Different lists value the same things differently.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:04 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ulrik wrote:
And even if the SR was the same, that still doesn't mean the price has to be the same.

Different lists value the same things differently.

Winner winner! Chicken dinner! :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote:
Like AoC, I'm of the view the costs should be the same across the lists.

Didn't you ask for Blood Angels Devestators to be made more expensive, so as to dissuade their use? :-)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:15 am
Posts: 1832
Location: Oslo, Norway
If you think they are worth 175 points in the SL list, change them.

Tbh I don't think 175 or 150 is going to make much difference as long as people take a single formation. And if TB spam (4 fms) isn't a problem there's probably no need for change in either lists.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Urgent! SL changes
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:14 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
Tbolt spam isn't a problem, I've never seen more than 2 formations in any list which wasn't playing CAPACAP.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net