elsmore01 wrote:
Although tbh it was nice to lose at EA for a reason other than remarkable ineptitude.
The ONLY way I play!
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=33805 |
Page 3 of 4 |
| Author: | Andrew_NZ [ Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Did you intend for the Storm Ravens to be able to Planetfall from the spacecraft? They have Planetfall so could, but are not on the transport list for either spacecraft. Would they take one (obviously at least two) of the six Thunderhawk slots? Or might they fill armoured vehicle slots. Twenty Planetfalling Storm Ravens might be overwhelming? |
|
| Author: | kyussinchains [ Sun Aug 11, 2019 12:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
It's meant to be self planetfall, will amend the list when I get a chance |
|
| Author: | Andrew_NZ [ Sun Aug 11, 2019 4:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
That seems pretty potent. Avoids AA bubble on arrival. Place anywhere (ok pre-plotted) at any stage in turn, activate on Init 1+ so guarantied arrival, no BMs from earlier shooting in arrival turn, engage range of 50 cm. Fairly potent FF, skimmer, OK armour. OK not so great if enemy has reasonable AT(/MW/TK) on overwatch, and the transport is destroyed along with its passengers. And a respectable upgrade cost in an activation count game. How has it gone in play testing? |
|
| Author: | Pencanenas [ Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Hi! One question: the modifier to the activation roll in order to the distance to an enemy formation, how does it interact with the self planetfall rule from the Storm Ravens? I think it shouldn't apply because the formation is out of the table at the activation moment. Rigth? |
|
| Author: | RugII [ Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
I recently played a game using EUK BA against RichL, I realise it’s a different list but the similarities might make the feedback useful. Death Company: 300pts for a unit without upgrades is too expensive. I like the attempts to remedy this with the free chaplain and 25pts jump packs, however jump packs really are necessary and the chaplain isn’t a great value upgrade for Death Company as they don’t suffer too badly from BMs, being fearless don’t NEED Inspiring to win combats at avoid hack downs, and already have INV as standard. 300-325 points is still too many points for a mandatory formation, it also makes BA pretty much unplayable using the minigeddon format. An option could be to remove the Death Company Dreadnought as a unit entry, and simply state that all units added to a Death Company formation gain Fearless and Invulnerable. This simplifies the list slightly, makes the Dreadnought upgrade a worthwhile 50pts, and most importantly makes the option of taking the free Rhinos credible. It could be such a credible option* that making the jumpacks upgrade free might even become possible (removing an awkward 25pts). Ideally I’d like to see the formation cost <300pts, but at least the above would provide a formation that has the mobility it NEEDS without having to buy upgrades and makes them more playable in a format that doesn’t allow Thunderhawks (minigeddon). *I’d be tempted to actually keep the DC mounted in their rhinos at the end of a turn ready to engage *GASPS* |
|
| Author: | elsmore01 [ Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
RugII wrote: 300-325 points is still too many points for a mandatory formation, it also makes BA pretty much unplayable using the minigeddon format. Agreed. took BA to a minigeddon tourney once, and they were a unplayable for this reason. Although tbh it was nice to lose at EA for a reason other than remarkable ineptitude. |
|
| Author: | jimmyzimms [ Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
elsmore01 wrote: Although tbh it was nice to lose at EA for a reason other than remarkable ineptitude. The ONLY way I play!
|
|
| Author: | Graf_Spee [ Sun Apr 18, 2021 1:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
I'm confused with the Baal predator.. is it meant to have 2 FF attacks? The normally applied +1EA can be somehow counter read with the 2x small arms.. or maybe it is just me Edit: not that I wouldn't love to have 2x 3+ IC fire fight attacks per Pred at that cost..
|
|
| Author: | jimmyzimms [ Sun Apr 18, 2021 3:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
no it's just stating that the FF attack has IC |
|
| Author: | oberKGBler [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Hi, Im new to NetEpic and I see that my beloved Blood Angels have a list in development. What does it need to make this list tournament ready? thx in advance 
|
|
| Author: | jimmyzimms [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 4:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Just confirming what version of the game you're looking to play. This is a list for 4th edition (Epic Armageddon). NetEpic is a fan continuation of the 2nd edition rules and is an unrelated game. As to the approval process, you can find the CRaP document under NetEA section which outlines the testing procedure. But in short, 12 games testing against approved lists from 3 independent groups, one of which is the list designer group. https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 69&t=24023 |
|
| Author: | Dave [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
* 18 games. 6 from the dev and 12 from two or more other groups. |
|
| Author: | oberKGBler [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Thank you for the quick reply. Im looking for a Blood Angels list for this ruleset: https://www.net-armageddon.org/ |
|
| Author: | Dave [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
That's Epic Armageddon. You're in the right place. NetEpic is NetEpic, and not how people refer to Epic Armageddon/EA/NetEA. |
|
| Author: | Starkad10 [ Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Blood Angels V3.1 List |
Interesting list. Question: The Furioso Dreadnought states it can take either 2 x powerfists (+1ea BC, MW attack) or a powerfist and frag launcher, which gives it +1ea for BC and FF... Aren't the two powerfists supposed to give it +2ea, or have I read it wrong for all the other lists wrong, for the whole time? Does this mean that the Blood Angels Storm Raven have a total of 3 attacks in a firefight, as it have two hurricane bolters? (Same goes for LR Crusader I suppose then?) |
|
| Page 3 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|