Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Blood Angels v2.12 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=21407 |
Page 1 of 15 |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:11 am ] | |||
Post subject: | Blood Angels v2.12 | |||
I've updated the Blood Angels list to contain the experimental changes proposed by the army Champion. 14/12/13 EDIT - I have corrected the missing Frenzied status of the unit types that should have this ability and that do not in the Compendium listing. I have placed it here for thoroughness and those who wish to have the twin of the Compendium list.
|
Author: | wargame_insomniac [ Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Anything that encourages Tactical formations in any SM list is always a good thing for me. Thanks James |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Quote: Should "Commander" be in this list? You're right, he shouldn't be there. I've nuked him from orbit. |
Author: | wargame_insomniac [ Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Just checking off the list of SM units that I intend to paint up as Blood Angels with the lastest BA army list. Am I right in thinking that Predator Annhiliators and Land Raiders can only be taken as the Heavy Support upgrade? And that Predator Destructors can't be taken at all (presume replaced by Ball Predators). I am not complaining. I am guessing that has been done for reasons of play balance to offset the Blood Angel advantages such as Death Company and Stormravens, not to mention frenzied ability. Just don't want to paint anything that I can't use in BA list, or would only use in limited numbers. Thanks very much James |
Author: | asdepicas [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
i´ve looked at the blood angel army list and just found that they cant use any type of titan, is there any reason or need for this? regular marine armies are allowed to use titans and really dont underestand why BAs cant |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
The Blood Angels are hiding technological secrets for their own benefit from the rest of the imperium, and so they basically refuse to fight on the same battlefields as the ad mech |
Author: | asdepicas [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
also found that baal predator has ff 4+, not that it isnt enough, but now that predator destructor has 3+ seems a bit unfair |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
No objection to an upgrade, they have slightly underperformed in my games. |
Author: | Ulrik [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Destructors are ff4+ in the compendium? |
Author: | asdepicas [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Evil and Chaos wrote: The Blood Angels are hiding technological secrets for their own benefit from the rest of the imperium, and so they basically refuse to fight on the same battlefields as the ad mech oh! really interesting, where can i found references to this? really would like to read about interesting background |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
It's in their Codex... Generally to do with their better Rhino engines. |
Author: | CAL001 [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Hey Mate, Are there supposed to be no titans in the list? I like the list, but taking on Titans without something a little bigger to take them on. I get that its a fast moving army designed to assault, so would not a Warhound only option suit the theme. Cheers Aaron |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
Nope as noted above it's an intentional weakness based on their background. |
Author: | carlisimo109 [ Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Blood Angels v2.12 |
One could still use normal Space Marine rules for an army painted up like Blood Angels, right? After a year of false starts I’ve started painting up my Blood Angels, but I have too much heavy support and too few jump pack marine stands for this list. On second thought… I’m okay if I paint tactical marine stands as a Death Company squad. How much better would jump pack D.C. be though? I’m happy to see Devastators are still in it, unlike the last EpicUK list I saw. Fluffwise (which is all I can really comment on at this point), I like it a lot! |
Page 1 of 15 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |