| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Dreadnought proposal. http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=10692 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
I'd just like to raise the prospect of allowing Dreadnoughts as an upgrade the Whilwind formations again. They're truly useful in that role. |
|
| Author: | Markconz [ Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
Sure and why not a couple of term squads too?  The ultra-elite of the Chapter are committed for critical assaults and crisis points, not sitting around on there laurels babysitting an artillery battery... Honestly easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for this one to be approved I think. If your friend wants to guard his artillery there is nothing to stop him using another formation to do it. |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
Because all th eother Dreadnought threads are closed look here: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....y229282 An "Ancients Assault Force" is mentioned. Perhabs a Dreadnought Formation? |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
Yup. According to Werseer: Ancients Assault Force' (Techmarine, Ven Dread, 3 Dreads + Flank March) http://warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117049 |
|
| Author: | Ilushia [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 3:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
I'm still a fan of letting them buy four-strong Dreadnought detachments. But that's probably best left to one of the variant lists, really. |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 3:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dreadnought proposal. |
Well in Wh40k SpaceMarines have officially access to one now. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|