| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Necron changes for Raider 2.0 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=18151 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Moscovian [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:37 pm ] | ||||
| Post subject: | Necron changes for Raider 2.0 | ||||
Unless there is a sufficiently good reason, the following attachments will be the official changes for Raiders 2.0. Feel free to post any concerns or questions, or report any errors. We're very close to print time.
|
|||||
| Author: | Moscovian [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:40 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 | ||
Last page which details the changes in the Design Notes.
|
|||
| Author: | zombocom [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
I don't like what you've done with the Necron rule FAQ. You've disallowed marshalling onto the board and regenerating units. We went through all this before, you were wrong on the intention and it was always supposed to be allowed. The wording of the rule currently also allows it, as they regroup on the board (regrouping comes after the move).You essentially have the two FAQs the wrong way round. Please fix this. The Necron rule also needs a note the the extra BM removed by leader can be used to bring units back, as it currently only talks about using the dice to do so. You also note the whole thing about "the reason for removing all BMs was so they couldn't marshall onto the board" in the notes. Again, this was never the case. Here's your post on the subject: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=17479&start=167 |
|
| Author: | Moscovian [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Zombocom, I grabbed the old pdf... Relax, switch to decaf, and just let me re-post. You aren't arguing for the prosecution, you know. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Sorry, I just don't want to have to go through all of that again, so I laid out every argument straight away. |
|
| Author: | Moscovian [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Or you could have just said, "Hey, I think you got the wording backwards on the FAQ - are you sure this is the right pdf?." |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Moscovian wrote: Or you could have just said, "Hey, I think you got the wording backwards on the FAQ - are you sure this is the right pdf?." Hey, I think you got these two FAQs backwards: Quote: Q. Can a Necron formation marshal on the board, move off the board, and then regenerate units? A. Yes, since the formation began its activation on the board this would count as regenerating on board, even though the move terminated off board. Q. Can a Necron formation marshal off the board, move onto the board, and then regenerate units? A. No, since the formation began its activation off the board this would be restricted under the Necron rule. 
|
|
| Author: | Moscovian [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Yeah yeah yeah.  I'm on my lunch break making single page pdfs of the new version. I'll get them up ASAP.
|
|
| Author: | lord-bruno [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
I think there´s a typo in the army list regarding Tomb Complex and Portals. It says LV cannot use it to enter the board, but they can according to the special rules. Is it intentional??? |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
lord-bruno wrote: I think there´s a typo in the army list regarding Tomb Complex and Portals. It says LV cannot use it to enter the board, but they can according to the special rules. Is it intentional??? The Necron army has no light vehicles in it, so it has probably never come up. (I still think Destroyers should be LVs!) |
|
| Author: | frogbear [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Chroma wrote: (I still think Destroyers should be LVs!) What he said |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
They're jetbike sized, and jetbike equivilents. Definitely not light vehicles, just most conversions people do are oversized. That's rather offtopic anyway... |
|
| Author: | Moscovian [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
I argued for LV status a few years ago until Corey pointed out what Zombocom just did. The measurements have it IMO. -- Be patient, folks, tomorrow I am free of Tax Day (free of the paperwork, anyway) and will get things done. Keep the comments rolling. |
|
| Author: | Onyx [ Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Hey Mosc. Has this been updated at all? I'm putting together a PDF for a local campaign and Tourney and I'd love to have the most recent stats and army rules available to our players. I was going to use the NetEA Necron Draft file but that has a few errors (Aeonic Orb counts as Ruined terrain error, Tomb Spyder costs and were the changes to the Pylon ever been made official - 90cm MW4+ (TKD3), 90cm AA4+ TK (1) ? ). Will there be a single page with all the up to date stats available aswell? Cheers for any help mate. Steve. |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Necron changes for Raider 2.0 |
Onyx wrote: I was going to use the NetEA Necron Draft file That document has not been updated to the newest rules yet, just so you're fully aware. Waiting on the "final" word from Raiders 2.0. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
