Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9154 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | javelin98 [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
I just ordered ten KV-2 tanks from Scotia Micro-Models to use as Ragnaroks. ?I was wondering if anyone had a GHQ version of the KV-2 and a GW/SG Ragnarok; ?I'd be willing to send one of the Scotia KV-2's to someone in order to get some comparison pics for everyone to see. The pricing side of it is pretty plain: Scotia KV-2 per model: ?$0.78 or ?0.40 ?(unit of six: ?$4.68 or ?2.40) GHQ KV-2 per model: ?$1.79 or ?0.90 ?(unit of six: $17.90 or ?9.00, since you can only order in multiples of five) GW Ragnarok per model: ?$7.33 or ?3.33 ?(unit of six: ?$44 or ?20) ...but it'd be helpful to show what people can expect to get for their money, and if they'd even want to consider the non-GW alternatives at all. ?Once I receive my order from Scotia, I'll post pics alongside an SG Leman Russ. Thanks, jav98 |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
I know they look similar, but I'm curious to see a pic of them side by side. |
Author: | Otterman [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
I think I can help out here with comparison pics. If my masculine charms work on Yen, expect them tomorrow morning. If not, then tonight. Cost to Otterman for Ragnaroks: (classified) |
Author: | redram [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Is this helpfull? From the GHQ Website: ![]() |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Not really. I'd like to see them in the same pic. |
Author: | javelin98 [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
The quality from GHQ is indeed top notch, but I think what we need to see is relative size, as well as detail, styling, etc. If the GHQ/Scotia KV-2's are far too small, then we can't really use them as proxies. There's quite a size difference between GHQ M113's and Epic Rhinos, for instance. |
Author: | javelin98 [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
@Otterman -- do you have GHQ or Scotia KV-2's? I can send you one of the Scotia models, if you have the others. It'd be great to get all three in the same pic. |
Author: | Otterman [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
GHQ. The Scotia would be most welcome. Hey, have I ever sent you Otter-goodies? |
Author: | javelin98 [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
(Otterman @ Apr. 13 2007,14:25) QUOTE GHQ. The Scotia would be most welcome. Hey, have I ever sent you Otter-goodies? Not yet, man! Show me the love! I'm not sure when that Scotia package should arrive, but when it does, I'll PM you and send one over. Thanks, jav98 |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Yes, Pics please ... But AFAIK, GHQ is usually smaller ... |
Author: | javelin98 [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
(Legion 4 @ Apr. 13 2007,15:49) QUOTE Yes, Pics please ... But AFAIK, GHQ is usually smaller ... Well, yeah, since Epic is now officially 8mm...! |
Author: | Otterman [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Behold: side comparison. Russian WWII T-35 heavy tank, with sponson sprue Russian WWII KV-2 PRoC modern Type 83 Self Propelled Howitzer Ragnarok dolly with metal turret |
Author: | Otterman [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Front view |
Author: | BlackLegion [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Very nice detail on the tanks ![]() |
Author: | Otterman [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ragnarok vs. KV-2 comparison? |
Supposedly, yes, 1/285. But as you can see, someone's idea of 1/285 is different than someone else's. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |