Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

FW Marine aircraft comparison
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9066		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  vanvlak [ Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:56 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Ulp! The SG Thunderhawk IS small. ANd the LC should carry several times the amount of the Thunderhawk...
What a scaley mess, as the Tyranid said to the Slann....

I still like the 'old tinies' anyway.
Author:  orangesm [ Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:28 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Based off the minis I would almost argue that the LC should be a lighter/less armed/armored lander, but it is a nice strong point when landed.  The minis are great, but now I am torn on whether I want to get 3 Thawks for my Epic Ultramarines.  I am probably going to get a few Thawks (both variants) for AI.
Author:  plm2212 [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:27 am ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
As much as I like the larger scale thunderhawk, I think the SG version will always be my favorite.  Thanks for the comparison though I was wondering just how much larger they were.

Laters
Author:  Otterman [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:15 am ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Me help Hena. Mommy says me smart.
Author:  Otterman [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:16 am ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Zooma zoom
Author:  zap123 [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:06 am ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
So the LC is obviously the cleverer design...It can carry 6 Rhinos!

:)
Author:  The_Real_Chris [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:21 am ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
However it doesn't come with the ablative shielding that apparently protects it during the drop.
Author:  mageboltrat [ Thu May 31, 2007 12:35 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
The funny thing is only 1 of them is out of scale, the SG Thunderhawk. The LC actually carries 6 Epic Rhinos, so that's to scale and the Thunderhawk Transport carries 2 Epic Rhinos, again to scale.
Author:  Otterman [ Thu May 31, 2007 1:20 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Has anybody proposed rules for a 'baby thunderhawk' (thunderchick?) to accurately reflect the smaller SG flier?
Author:  Warmaster Nice [ Thu May 31, 2007 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Not that I know of... But if they do I'l love to se a set of rules for the even smaller Mk1 Thunerbrick! I mean: It is hardly the size of the cockpit of the FW T-hawl :D
Author:  mageboltrat [ Thu May 31, 2007 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison

(Hena @ May 31 2007,13:27)
QUOTE

(mageboltrat @ May 31 2007,14:35)
QUOTE
The funny thing is only 1 of them is out of scale, the SG Thunderhawk. The LC actually carries 6 Epic Rhinos, so that's to scale and the Thunderhawk Transport carries 2 Epic Rhinos, again to scale.

Not really. How the heck does the Landing Craft store all 12 stands?

They sit in the rhinos?
Author:  illuvitar [ Thu May 31, 2007 6:34 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
However it doesn't come with the ablative shielding that apparently protects it during the drop.
and why would the T-hawk need shielding for reentry ? our primitive spaceships only need this because they enter the atmosphere at near orbital speeds, which they do because they haven't got the fuel to slow down.
o.k. sorry i know that nobody on this thread really cares about the real rocket science behind the thunderhawk, i just can't help myself. :)
Author:  Lextar [ Thu May 31, 2007 8:33 pm ]
Post subject:  FW Marine aircraft comparison
Just curious, from the diagram, does it mean you can assemble the T-Hawk Transporter without the Rhino/Land Raider?
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/