| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| NetEA Approved Squat Lists? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=69&t=18235 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | eriochrome [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | NetEA Approved Squat Lists? |
I noticed that the Squats do not have a NETEA list here with pictures and nice formating. Is this in the works or where can I find it? |
|
| Author: | Chroma [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Approved Squat Lists? |
Welcome to the forums, eriochrome! There are currently no NetEA endorsed Squats lists as there have been multiple attempts at development and, as far as I know, nothing has been consolidated; "Section 13" of the NetEA Army Documents has been reserved for any future Squat development. More discussion can be found in the EA Other Forces forum. |
|
| Author: | eriochrome [ Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Approved Squat Lists? |
I will go down there and check it out. |
|
| Author: | arkturas [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NetEA Approved Squat Lists? |
I know one of the main differences is the Leviathan class WE's have different weapon loads and stats (Squats get higher DC and generally better guns, Demiurg get a special invulnerable save). The character structure and army lists are also quite different (with points used to denote rarity and different units for the same models (Guildmaster/Hearthguard Cavalry)). On the whole they are still Experimental but nothing really problematic. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|