KTG17 wrote:
primarch wrote:
KTG17 wrote:
Also, to keep our esteemed forum "safe" from GW we are not allowed to post topics with to condone or promote such things.
Safe from what? I don't see how GW has any authority over anyone to prevent open discussion on anything. I see discussions on dakkadakka about fakes, and even specific chinese sellers for 40k copy cats. And those are straight copies.
If I was posting pics of some minis I made, that were copies of Epic Leman Russes, and selling them on here for $5 each, I can see GW getting a little upset. But if I said, I met this guy who makes great proxies for Leman Russes and GW got hissy over it, I would tell them to kiss my @ss. My opinion is my opinion.
Hi!
GW has (on many occasions, including big social media sites not just small ones), demanded the removal, lock or alteration of things it considers harmful to its IP, not limited to but including recasting and "forumware".
You are correct that other sites can and do engage in such conversations, but those have not yet felt the "sting" of GW legal.
Keep in mind the "otterman" you mentioned was on this site and that such conversations on THIS site lead to him getting a cease and desist order. Since then that particular subject is not one that is engaged in other than passing references to it. The cease and desist while not towards the owner of these forums (cybershadow), did occur on the site and to permit additional recurrences of that topic could incur in a cease and desist to the site for "aiding in the spread of IP infringement". This is well established pattern with plenty of judicial precedent. GW has done this on Facebook, ebay and many others.
All that said, that incident occurred before the now famous "chapter house verdict" which has varied implications for produced minis and accessories that either GW doesn't make or that someone could make "for use with" a GW game. While the verdict did not go totally "one way", it is generally considered a loss for GW since they can't block anyone making "compatible products". You can tell them to "take a hike", but coming up with the cash for defense is another thing, even chapter house needed "pro-bono" counsel to be able to fight against them. For most complying with a cease and desist is the most logical course of action.
Now, people can and do sell "forumware" on Taccoms, but that is usually reselling things obtained during the period that was openly done here. Selling one or two things is no biggie (I don't think anyone would notice), but once you start going bigger (entire lines of stuff or big sell offs), that could be a problem.
As of late the vibe here is that talking about it is okay (you see pictures of them all the time), but just don't use the site as a gateway to "advertise" such "products". After all if we like to site to discuss things we don't want it to get into trouble over this.
If you have any further questions on this point please PM Cybershadow. I am sure he will lay out the guidelines on this particular subject more fully as well as explain the "whys" of it.
Primarch