Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 20120208
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=22517		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  adam77 [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 20120208
Great work!

Request that the version number is included in the document itself somewhere (so a printed copy can be identified).
Author:  Simulated Knave [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 20120208
In the spirit of NetEA, I formally object to the chosen date format. DDMMYYYY would create less inconsistency and confusion in the year 10,000+.

I feel we should take more care to consider the long-term implications of our decisions.
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 20120208
So what you want is for the Date format to be 0208.012M03?
Author:  Dobbsy [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 20120208
Dave wrote:
Please restrict posts on this topic to typos only.


COUGH...! :D
Author:  Dave [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
And split...
Author:  madd0ct0r [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
To accommodate everyone, I propose we keep the current datestamp, add the 0208.012M03 stamp, add the Julian Calender date, add the Stardate, add the SEA Lunar Calender date, the Hassidic lunar calender date and the decimalized time record.
Author:  CyberShadow [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
You guys crack me up!
Author:  wargame_insomniac [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
Likewise but thankfully Dave has split this off from the original post requesting typos only.
Author:  Dave [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
It took three whole posts before we saw something non-typo related. A let down really...

I bet on it taking one. :P
Author:  wargame_insomniac [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
Tangents-R-Us.....
Author:  mattthemuppet [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
we had quite a lot of snow last night, heavy stuff too.

What? This thread is about the merits of Gregorian vs. Hassidic time stamps? Piffle. What's far more important is getting the whole of the Americas to see sense and write the date as Day-Month-Year. Otherwise my supremely cool birthdate of 5678 becomes a far more humdrum 6578. Chicks just wont find me attractive any more :(
Author:  Ginger [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
Hey MM, would you be connected with dance in some way? ;D
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
mattthemuppet wrote:
Chicks just wont find me attractive any more :(


Are these those freaky New England chicks whose sexual wiles you're still adjusting to?

I can see it now:

Boston Girl: Let's leave this bah and get in mah cah. Ah'll take you to mah place.
MTM: Blimey!
Author:  zombocom [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
YYYYMMDD makes most sense for file version numbers as you can sort files alphabetically correctly.
Author:  CyberShadow [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Comments on the NetEA Army List Compendium 2012 - 201202
That's how I number things always too.... but that's far too sensible for this thread.
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/