Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Army Champion feedback

 Post subject: Army Champion feedback
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:17 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Quote (The_Real_Chris @ 07 Jan. 2006 (00:54))
No IG stuff? I thought everyone was set on a tweaked Baneblade at least?

I didn't mean no changes, I meant that nothing was really controversial left to discuss.

For example, in the marine list I said there were only a couple issues.  There are actually many minor adjustments, but I don't think that things like tweaking the armor points cost and changing the speed on the Vindis and Assault Bikes is an issue any more.  The only controversy is things like the Dread formation/upgrade and exactly what form a tweak to TSKNF should take.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Army Champion feedback
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Any chance of an open discussion re TSKNF? I still the reckon the best idea that came up on the old board was to let TSKNF leaders remove 2 BM. Simple, understated and gives a boost to SM characters.

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Army Champion feedback
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:10 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
It's been discussed several times, but I'm sure it will be posted again with request for comment when we get to the army review stage.

Personally, my preference is to expand the  2BM=1BM for SMs concept.  I would like to see the -2BM for Leader, and the "BMs count half in assault (round down)" that was playtested extensively but removed before publication.  I favor those over the various "outnumbering" modifications that were proposed for assault resolution because they seem more thematic to me.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net