(Ginger @ Mar. 28 2008,19:45)
QUOTE
While I agree that it is evidently the intention to treat this as the "final" revision process, I did not think it was complete yet because of the apparent intention to amend the online text.
It seems that JJ is prepared to accept revisions to the wording in the Errata, so I thought there might be a small window of opportunity to correct the army lists as well. After all it would be a pity if the rules were finished while the army lists had significant problems; especially if we already had agreed fixes available. Hence the suggestion that IMHO we need to draw up the changes for each army list ASAP.
If we can do this now, at least it gives JJ the opportunity to review them and put them up on the SG site. This activity needs to be done anyway if we are to make progress; it would just be so much better IMHO if we could get everything into one central point.
Note, I also believe that any army list change proposed must have unanimous support (at the very least by the leading authorities in the community). Any proposed change that is still being disputed will probably be rejected automatically, and may cast doubt on the other proposals. This is why I think we need to get the changes for each list posted in the relevant army folder to prove that the community does indeed accept them as needed. (unless you can think of a better approach
)
)
