Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
[rules questions] alternate deployment zones http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27063 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Borka [ Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [rules questions] alternate deployment zones |
Yeah that's how we play it. |
Author: | Ginger [ Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: [rules questions] alternate deployment zones |
Rastamann wrote: We've played it like that as well but I thought I should ask. When do you guys feel it's the better deployment option? That is the correct layout. You will note that each deployment area is only 5 feet long so the entire area is only 2.25 sq. feet, as compared with the standard deployment are that is 6 feet long and covers 3 sq. feet This is useful in two ways 1. This reduced deployment area allows you to have a better chance of spacecraft bombardment hitting a target, 2. In general it means that enemy formations have further to travel so you can make it harder for non-mechanised armies to reach objectives. |
Author: | Alf O'Mega [ Tue Mar 11, 2014 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [rules questions] alternate deployment zones |
I have to admit that this this rule had happily passed me by until yesterday in my game with Rastamann!! Definitely one to remember - it could make things very tricky for a foot slogging horde army... |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |