Hi there all - It is me, the owner of this account here rather than 'someone else' who created this thread.
I want to say I read the open ground rule differently.
Quote:
Open Ground: Infantry count as being in cover (-1 to hit modifier) and receive a 5+ cover save if they are on
Overwatch in Open Ground. This represents the fact that stationary infantry are very hard to see. Note that the
save will be lost after the infantry shoot and the Overwatch marker is removed.
I interpret this as ALL infantry get the -1 to hit modifier in open ground, and if they are on overwatch they additionally get the 5+ cover save.
There are 2 points why I think this.
1)
Quote:
Infantry count as being in cover (-1 to hit modifier) and receive a 5+ cover save if they are on
Overwatch in Open Ground.
I interperite this as the underlined section being in addition to the non-underlined section when on overwatch. IMO The if applies to the and. Otherwise it is a very cumbersome and ambiguous manner of saying [font=]'Infantry on overwatch recieve a -1 to hit and 5+ cover save.'[/font] No need for the and-if combination in the sentance.
Essentially I read it as
X is applied AND (y is applied IF condition Z)Secondly,
Quote:
Note that the
save will be lost after the infantry shoot and the Overwatch marker is removed.
This implies that the infantry will retain the -1 to hit modifier when it is no longer on overwatch as it only explicitly states the
cover save is lost - not the to hit modifier. SO infantry no longer on overwatch still get the -1 to hit modifier? Honestly does not make sence to me

What makes infantry on overwatch harder to see than infantry just hunkered down but not cocked and loaded so to speak?
We - our beginner gaming group - have agreed to follow what is said here, but I would like to know why I am misunderstanding what I think is an unambiguous statement.
Thanks
AgeingHippy