Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

Epic A game SM vs IG

 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:36 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Hi

I had a 2,700 points game Epic last Wednesday playing SM (Crimson Fists) against local gaming club members IG (Steel Legion). My opponent, Alex, took 3 Leman Russ companies, a Basilisk company & 4 Sentinels ? no infantry!!! I took 3 tactical detachments, 1 devastator, 2 assault, 1 bike, 1 predator & 1 terminator detachment- effectively I had 1 reinforced SM company. 2 of the tactical detachments were bolstered by Supreme Commander and Librarian respectively, with a Chaplain exhorting 1 of the Assault detachments on.

We played on a 6? by 5? table. The main bits of terrain was a some thick hedges placed diagonally in the middle of table, which Alex decided should be impenetetrable terrain ?and thus you could not move or shoot through, apart from 1 gap which was in the dead centre of table. Apart from that 1 had small urban area on my left (3 of FW building) and a hill on the right. Alex had 2 further hills on his deployment zone, one on each flank.

I set up my bikes on the extreme right flank with my tactical, devastator & predator detachments in the middle, with infantry mounted up in rhinos. The assault formations lurked behind the rhinos (the almost ubiquitous T-Hawk not yet painted up in Crimson Fists colours) with terminators ready to deep strike. Alex placed his 3 Leman Russ companies evenly across his baseline with artillery company centrally and the sentinel on his extreme left opposite my bikes.

First turn:
I was lucky to win initiave and seeing 9 basilisks without infantry cover there was only 1 option. Terminators have kicked butt in every game of Epic ?we have played so far and this was no exception. The terminators took out couple of basssies and their tough armour shrugged off return firefight. Rolling a 6 on the combat resolution roll certainly helped and with Alex?s unfortunate low roll meant that a further 5 bassies were wiped out!! The 2 surviving bassies fled from these teleporting nasties to leave them at the mercy of IG revenge fire.

Some 30 dice rolls later three quarters of the termies were wiped out, their armour unable to withstand the weight of enemy fire. The sole survivor ran for cover but satisfied by a job well done. The central company of Leman Russ went onto overwatch whilst the other rumbled forward to park on the hill overlooking my left hand flank.

On the other flank the sentinels and bikes zoomed towards each other, the assault bike placing a solitary blast marker but doing no damage. The rest of my army rushed forward at triple speed with 1 of assault detachments able to jump behind the sentinels to set up potential cross fire for turn 2. The central Leman Russ company had an opportunity to fire at 1 of my tactical detachments as it zipped forward but chose not to given the cover bonus. In end phase both bassies and terminator rallied and the sentinels cleared their 1 blast marker.

Second turn:
Winning initiative again I shot with the attack bike again, this time killing a sentinel due to cross fire reducing their armour save. Trying to retain the initiative I failed before I remembered the Supreme Commander re-roll in the nick of time. The assault marines ambled forward chopping up the remaining 3 sentinels with ease. This time I remembered the consolidation move to nudge closer to the enemy lines.

The Leman Russ parked on the hill on my left flank went onto overwatch. Faced with 20 Leman Russ on overwatch, I left that flank untouched and concentrated on the other flank. ?I was able to use the SM speed (90cm when triple move!!) to radly redeploy to allow my smaller formations to gang up on his much larger formation- the 3 rd Leman Russ company.

My shooting did n't do much damage with only 2 casualties from fire of 2 SM Tactical formations, devastators AND predators (cursed 4+ reinforced armour on his Leman Russ) but also placed 5 blast markers to suppress their return fire. I was surprised when Alex chose not to fire with this 3rd Leman Russ company choosing to move to be in position for next turn. Even though 5 of the remaining 7 Russes were suppressed I would personally have shot to start whittling down the SM. In the end phase the 3rd Leman Russ company cleared 3 BM?s to leave just 2.

Third turn:
Winning initiative again I ganged up on the 3rd Leman Russ company, shooting at them with devastators (killing 2 more Russes) to add another ?3 blast markers before charging into close assault. My tactical detachment bounced off their thick armour, and I suffered 2 casualties to none. However again I had good rolls for combat resolution and with all bonuses for outnumbering & blast markers I won the combat by 1, breaking the 3rd Leman Russ company.

The other 2 Leman Russ companies remained on overwatch but there was no way I was going near them. It may not have been heroic for SM tactical detachment with Supreme Commnader to hide behind hill but it was certainly tactically advantageous. As they were Crimson Fists rather than frothing Blood Angels/Space Wolves I decided would be stupid to brave the fire of 20 Leman Russ.

At end of 3 d turn I had won 1 victory condition (They Shall Not Pass) and almost won 2 others Take and Hold (foiled by enemy forces being 1cm within range to contest baseline objective) and Break Their Spirit (the 3 rd Leman Russ Company was broken but not destroyed). So it finished one-nil.

After game debrief:
It was shame that game ended up being as one sided as it was was. I don?t think it was that enjoyable for Alex.

Alex definitely needed to get a supreme commander as he was very unlucky with his activation rolls. When he did get to activate his firing was very deadly but he suffered from not getting enough turns of shooting in. Because Alex had so few formations, when he did fail an activation it did cost him dearly.

Alex definitely needed some infantry to protect his artillery from my deep striking terminators. He could have then taken supreme commander for re-rolled failed initiative and also taken some commissars.
If he could have shot his artillery early in the game it could have destroyed the far smaller SM formations and at the very least would have made it harder for me to activate if I already had Blast Markers.

In my previous games against Alex I had used my Orks. Those games were far more straight forward slugfests with real war of attrition between IG & Orks meaning that we had had a close win apiece. He had faced Jim?s SM before but Jim had n?t exploited the full manouvreability of the SM. I think my use of triple moves for the first two turns to redeploy caught him on the hop. His Leman Russes did n?t get enough shots in as he was keeping them in Overwatch in static positions rather than moving & firing. I know when you adavance that any shooting is ?1 to hit but with the weight of shots from 20 Leman Russes that would have made me far more cautious.

From my side it was good to play Epic Armageddon again after couple of months break. Also good to finally play decent sized game. The previous games I had played were slowly working up from missions in the rulebook to then 1,000 points and then 1,200/1,500/1,800/2,000/2,500 points. It was good to finally play a Grand Tournament size legal army. Next up we will try 3,000 points to allow us 1/2 more units.

So far we have managed to get 4 regular players of Epic at our local gaming club with another 4 more sporadic occasional players. I am hoping to play Hanbury?s Orks soon and then Jim?s Chaos when he gets back in a month.

Cheers

James[B][/U][U]

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:31 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Wow no infantry! Thanks for the battle report WI! Did the guard player have commisars in his companies?

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:46 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
Yep ... got to have Infantry ... :;):

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:40 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Quote (Markconz @ 19 Nov. 2005 (20:31))
Wow no infantry! Thanks for the battle report WI! Did the guard player have commisars in his companies?

No he did n't have commissars.

I realised after the game that he could have done & have suggested it to him for next time.

Cheers

James

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:54 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Quote (Legion 4 @ 20 Nov. 2005 (06:46))
Yep ... got to have Infantry ... :;):

I think he got seduced by the power of the Russ. In previus games we have played at our club a single company of Leman Russ have just rocked. I guess he thought if 1 Company was good then 3 Companies would be 3 times as good.

I have suggested that if he wants to play Artillery in 2,700 points that he is better off taking a couple of batteries rather than full company. Especially with 3 Companies of Leman Russ!!

Anyway he did say before the start of the game that he knew he had taken an unbalanced army and that he would either win big/lose big. I was initially really daunted but the double teaming of shooting (to place BM's) and then charging (so using CC rather than FF values) worked out better than I expected.

I just hope he does n't get too disheartened and that we can have a rematch soon. I will be taking exactly the same army (with addition of T-Hawk if we go from 2,700 points to 3,000 points) and if he takes a more balanced IG force then hopefully we will have a more even game.

Cheers

James

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
Well ... It sounds like an interesting concept & fun ! :;): :laugh:

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:07 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Thanks for the Report WI, it brought back some memories of games that I have played in.

I know that others have made LR companies work but I never could, I would always leave them on OW or else sit and sustained fire with them. Not the best way to use 650pts.

I played against two LR companies and a Warlord in one tournament. That was a frightening army to face. I think that over all I only killed 3 LR and 4 sentinals during the whole game. However due to skill, planning and a lot of luck I managed to break the LR Companies and Warlord in the final turn to win the game. It was one of the most intense games I have played and certainly not like my normal games with orks.

Tiny





_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Epic A game SM vs IG
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:03 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
It definitely sounds like your opponet earned the defeat he got, the battle report reads like he basicly set there and let his indecisiveness defeat him as much as your SMs, his force was unballanced, his starting placement perhaps unwise and his over reliance on overwatch and reluctance to actually fire at his opponet all added up, he actually didnt loose as badly as he should have honestly.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net