Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1182 |
Page 1 of 12 |
Author: | dafrca [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:29 am ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Just curious if anyone has tried the Titan Army List? If so, what did you think? dafrca |
Author: | dysartes [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Yo! I have ![]() Current incarnation being a pair of Reavers, Ordinatus Mars, 2 Warhound Pairs and 2 single Warhounds..... |
Author: | iblisdrax [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Conclusions? ![]() my 2cents, iblisdrax |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
The Ordinatus are on that link ? Do they give Stats !? My gaming buddy is researching that as I can't get into the site ! ![]() |
Author: | Justiniel [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Yup, the Ordinati are on that link, complete with stats, maybe someone here could e-mail you the docs? |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Thanks "J" ! I'll have to call my G/bud ... again ! ![]() |
Author: | nealhunt [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
I've played a couple titan games. I think it's an okay list. I still think it lacks character, being a hodgepodge of lots of different Adeptus Titanicus stuff rather than just a titan legion. I think both the titan and gargant lists are going to be quite challenging to balance for a tournament game. Large WEs are difficult for most armies to deal with. One in an army is okay. Two or more is bound to cause problems and I'm not sure that it's anything that can be solved. |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
I still think it lacks character, being a hodgepodge of lots of different Adeptus Titanicus stuff rather than just a titan legion. |
Author: | dafrca [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:41 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? | ||
Interesting. I am glad we went the way we did though. With Epic loosing ground and heading down the tubes, this way maybe rules for many of those units and formations will become offical before it goes dorment again. ![]() dafrca |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
Interesting. I am glad we went the way we did though. With Epic loosing ground and heading down the tubes, this way maybe rules for many of those units and formations will become offical before it goes dorment again. |
Author: | dafrca [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 9:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
I look at it like this. It seems to be cyclic, so I will ride the wave and get what I can when the wave goes down. ![]() dafrca |
Author: | nealhunt [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
My post probably sounded unduly harsh. I should be more clear. ======= What I object to is the inclusion of Titans AND Ordinati AND Knights, not minor support units. Each of those kinds of units is characterful enough to support its own distinct list. A small amount of inter-support would be fine. Allowing all of them to be a substantial portion of the army list puts their distinct feels into competition, resulting in an unfocused and muddled list. And if those three units weren't enough to water down the character of the list, it also packs in the Capital Imperialis. I would greatly prefer separate TL, AM (Ordinati), and Knight Household lists. The CI could be put into a new IG list, possibly Cadian for instance. I believe that would give a much crisper, cleaner flavor to units that really deserve the full treatment. I understand the argument for "get it now before it's gone" but I'd rather have quality at the risk of not having an official use for some units. I think the Fan Squat list for EA, not to mention the tremendous job on NetEpic, is clear evidence that this community can come up with really good "unofficial" rules to use those models. |
Author: | dafrca [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:27 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? | ||
I did not think you were harsh at all. ![]() I think we need to keep in mind we were given a starting point from JJ before we started. One of his instructions was to include these things and create a "generic" Titan Legion list. The idea was that later we might have veriations like "Knight Household" or "AM Legion". He even used the IG and Marines as examples. The basic generic IG list came first, then they took it and created Siege Masters etc. Same for the Marines. Generic first and then Blood Angelse etc. In any case, I did not take your comments as Harsh or bad. dafrca |
Author: | Tas [ Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:32 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? | ||
Hit the Deck!!! Pigs diving in from 6 o'clock high!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:38 am ] |
Post subject: | AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army? |
I would greatly prefer separate TL, AM (Ordinati), and Knight Household lists. The CI could be put into a new IG list, possibly Cadian for instance. I believe that would give a much crisper, cleaner flavor to units that really deserve the full treatment. |
Page 1 of 12 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |