Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Hi all, Ork list

 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:51 am
Posts: 122
I find that with the 4+ invulnerable save the SC is usually worth getting in to have a better chance of getting the CC MW attacks in vs the 5+ FF attacks. I find they'll usually survive against what I throw at them.

That said though there is something to be said for showing some caution with that particular unit... It is a blow to lose your supreme commander, no matter how cheap he might be.

It's also partially part of my style too... I'm loathe to hide my units if I can go for the throat... I'm definitely one of those 'take the fight to their doorstep' kind of generals.

Adam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:55 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
I don't think the spacecraft is a viable issue with respect to the power of the list.  Fielding a serious portion of your force as a Slow and Steady drop force has always been a highly risky move.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:51 am
Posts: 122
Yup, I agree... I always own anyone who fields their stuff in a Slow and Steady ship...

Adam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Okay, I'm just going to ask one more question about Ulthwe balance and then stand down:

Do people believe that the advantages of Ulthwe (SR5, Black Guardians, potential activation advantage, Seer Council) are balanced by the disadvantages (no Aspect Warhost, no Autarch, small Aspect Troupes) sufficiently that their units should cost exactly the same as Biel-Tan's?

I can essentially duplicate a Biel-Tan army with Ulthwe's list, nearly model for model, and Uthwe will always be superior due to the SR5 and unit(s) of 1+ Guardians. ?Do people play Biel-Tan without Guardian units to take advantage of massed Aspects? ?That would seem to be a brutal disadvantage to loose Farsight and the Avatar.  If you're air dropping in Aspects via Vampire, the initial attack is exactly the same with a Warhost or two Troupes.

I can't see how people can see this as balanced, and Battlestats seems to be showing the same picture.  And I do believe that "comparing across armylists" is a valid approach in this case.  If it is balanced and I'm missing something, please let me know; I'll get off the soapbox and get back to playing.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:04 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
I agree that a BT version of a Ulthwe list will be inferior and that is how it should be. A BT list as would probably not work at all.

With the play testing we have tried to follow the lead set by other lists that formations that have already been given a value keep it for a variant list.

Now a question we did look long and hard at was should Black Guardians cost more. After testing we said no.

I think that I should add that I now believe that the cost for Big and Uge Speed Freak Warbands is too low and would like to see them increased, but that's for another topic. :)

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:29 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (Tiny-Tim @ 20 2005 July,16:04)
I agree that a BT version of a Ulthwe list will be inferior and that is how it should be. A BT list as would probably not work at all.

With the play testing we have tried to follow the lead set by other lists that formations that have already been given a value keep it for a variant list.

But what about an Ulthwe version of a Biel-Tan list?  How many Aspect Warhosts do you usually field in 2700 points?

But, and that's my point, the formations in the Ulthwe list aren't the same as in the Biel-Tan list, so they shouldn't cost the same; a little point tweaking can go a long way to differentiating the units.

Could you please give the reasoning behind not increasing the cost of the Black Guardian Hosts, or link to the discussion on the old boards, if any?  I'd gladly pay 25-50 points more for 1+ initiative.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:03 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:51 am
Posts: 122
I will generally only ever feild one aspect host in a 2,700pt list... As a rule I'm usually loathe to spend allot of points on a single formation, instead feeling much more comfortable to spend the points on smaller formations to work in unison.

Adam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:05 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Do people play Biel-Tan without Guardian units to take advantage of massed Aspects?  That would seem to be a brutal disadvantage to loose Farsight and the Avatar.


I not uncommonly see a single Guardian host to get those advantages.  My regular opponent uses a single Guardian host for area denial.  That's typically the only Guardians.

If you're air dropping in Aspects via Vampire, the initial attack is exactly the same with a Warhost or two Troupes.


The follow up is dramatically different.

Most likely, Ulthwe will have a crippled formation (if not outright destroyed) and no way to combine those Exarchs (assuming both survive) into a single 2xInspiring attack.  OTOH, an aspect host will almost certainly survive with 2 Exarchs meaning it is still a serious threat for clipping assaults.

Aspect Hosts provide uses that are simply not available to Ulthwe - truly large formations, firepower-oriented hosts, and hosts of Hawks and Spears which have certain advantages over a mounted troupe in a similar role.

=========

Don't get me wrong, Chroma.  You make excellent points.  There might be a slight advantage to Ulthwe overall and I'm not claiming that there absolutely is not one.  If you want a Guardian or even a troupe-heavy army, I would definitely to go for Ulthwe because they would be better than a Biel Tan version.

I just think that it's close enough to call it done and see it played until the Eldar review.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:29 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:51 am
Posts: 122
I'm in agreement actually... Those Aspect Hosts are certainly worth their points as offered in the Biel-Tan list and while you can create a relative proximity of the same effect by using an arial assault with a vampire generally that is the exception and not the rule and the two aspect formations are much more susceptible to breaking then the large Biel-Tan host offered.

All in all I think that the overall power of the Ulthwe list in comparison with the Biel-Tan list is in line with each other and the Ulthwe list is damned near completion.

Adam






Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (nealhunt @ 20 2005 July,18:05)
Don't get me wrong, Chroma. ?You make excellent points. ?There might be a slight advantage to Ulthwe overall and I'm not claiming that there absolutely is not one. ?If you want a Guardian or even a troupe-heavy army, I would definitely to go for Ulthwe because they would be better than a Biel Tan version.

I just think that it's close enough to call it done and see it played until the Eldar review.

Thanks for the support!

Okay, you've convinced me to stand down and watch and
wait.  I'll still be doing play testing of them (Supposed to have two matched of Biel-Tan vs Ulthwe this weekend) and report any "irregularities" I see.

Now off to abuse the L&D list!  *laugh*

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:19 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Actually, I passed on your concerns to the ERC members and Jervis.  I don't really have balance concerns as much as I have concerns about the perception issues you raised.  Perception is extremely important if you want people to consider the list to be fair.

The specific recommendations I threw out were:

+25 points for Black Guardian Hosts
separate list entries for Guardians/Black Guardians for clarity
+50 points for Farseer Counsel (instead of +25)

I know it's not as much as you would like to see, but I think the impact on the perceived fairness of the list will be big.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (nealhunt @ 22 2005 July,22:19)
Actually, I passed on your concerns to the ERC members and Jervis. ?I don't really have balance concerns as much as I have concerns about the perception issues you raised. ?Perception is extremely important if you want people to consider the list to be fair.

I know it's not as much as you would like to see, but I think the impact on the perceived fairness of the list will be big.

Thanks again Neal!

Heck, if I could, I'd have everything cheaper just so I could field more stuff... but I don't think anyone would want to play against such a force.  *laugh*

I look forward to hearing the results; anything to take the edge of perceived Eldar beardiness is a good thing to me.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:24 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Quote (nealhunt @ 22 2005 July,22:19)
The specific recommendations I threw out were:

+25 points for Black Guardian Hosts
separate list entries for Guardians/Black Guardians for clarity
+50 points for Farseer Counsel (instead of +25)

Hi Neal,

With your recommendations did you include any modification to the one third rule for BG?

As for paying more for the SC again, this is an area where I don't mind the change. The original testing was for the up-grade to be either +25 or +50pts. It was deemed best to go for the lower point value at the time to encourage people to take the option also the SR was also fixed at 5 around this time.

Tim

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:50 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Well got a game in with Nick (Mekboy) Simmerson over the weekend. I used my Ulthwe under the BT list and rules and Nick dusted off his Marines. It was a standard 2.7k pt tournament battle with no experimental rules and us just keeping an eye on what influences some possible changes to SM would create.

The simplest BR on this is that my dice were hot and Nick placed 2 tactical formations too far forward at the start of the game to destroy my Storm Serpent and they were subsequently hammered but the rest of my army.

If I could guarentee dice rolls like that again I would say that there was no need to have an Ulthwe list. However I won't be that hot again and Nick will get his SM head on for the next battle so we might be able to give some more feed back then.

Tim

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Hi all, Ork list
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:30 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
With your recommendations did you include any modification to the one third rule for BG?


Nope.  Personally, I think added flexibility in allowing BG upgrades for bikes and warwalkers would be acceptable from both balance and feel standpoints as long as only the number of hosts counted for how many total upgrades were received.

However, our beloved army champion disagrees and I'm happy to defer to his greater knowledge and experience.

Did you have a specific change in mind?

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net