Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Specific Marine List vs. IG

 Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:57 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
No Infantry !!!  Madness !!!  Too bad E:A fell back into what many games of the past have ... making Grunts of little use.  That was one of the things that first attracted me to SM1 ... infantry could actually do some things that they were supposed to do.     And that is not a mechanized force, he is taking, it is an armored force.  A Mech force by definition is Infantry in tracks ... with some tank support if he's lucky ...  :;):

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:01 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Um... That's not his army list, guys.  That's what he has to choose from.

Mich:  I'd go with list 1, with a couple mods.

1) Drop the razorbacks and hunter from the tac formation.  It's an okay base of fire unit, but if you are going that route, you will get more bang from devastators.  I prefer to keep the tacs as multi-functional as possible.

2)  Drop the LRs with the devs, replace them with razorbacks.  It's the same amount of AT fire for half the price.  It's also faster at deploying, and since you can't garrison with the transports, you really need to get to your firing position in your first move.   I would also replace the Hunter cut from the tacs in this formation.

3)  At this point, you've got some extra points left (~250, plus whatever leftover you had).  I would strongly consider preds for a lot of AT fire without much cost.  I would also consider adding a commander to the tacs or the other termie formation.  With the termies, it will make a wicked 2 formation/commander/chaplain assault.  A commander with the tacs would give you a second multi-formation assault.  If it came down to it, I would drop the scouts to fit the preds and commanders in.

Just my personal preference, though... :)

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:04 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:30 pm
Posts: 18
No announcement on the SG page, but the v$ Tau list is up.
Bunch of new vehicles, but the idea is to see which 2/3 are the coolest/flavourfulest/usefulest, and so on, and eventually to pare it down to just a few new units.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:03 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 12:58 am
Posts: 660
Location: S.W London.
Just printed out my copy.Some interesting stuff, and a more flexable list :)
And only a few things to moan at, looks very tempting. The down graded xv8 will cheer up my eldar opponent :laugh:
Cheers.

_________________
Zulus' Sir! fousands of 'em!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net