Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

[NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=19878		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  Chroma [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:33 am ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Greetings from the NetERC and the NetEA Project!

Please find attached the 2010 Draft of the Craftworld Eldar Army section of the NetEA Army Book. Please examine this document for typos, inconsistencies, and unclearness, or any other issues you may feel need to be resolved before final release. And Ginger, I'll finally be addressing concerns you raised in the very near future.

Thank you!


This section includes the following armies:

BIEL-TAN CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

ALAITOC CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

ULTHWÉ CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

IYANDEN CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT

SAIM-HANN CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT

IYBRAESIL CRAFTWORLD CRONE WORLD RAIDERS ELDAR ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT

YME-LOC CRAFTWORLD ARMY LIST- IN DEVELOPMENT

BIEL-TAN GREAT COURT OF THE YOUNG KING ELDAR ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL

FIR IOLARION ELDAR TITAN CLAN ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL


If there are lists you feel have been missed, please feel free to contact myself or any other members of the NetERC.

Attachments:
2010 - NetEA-ArmyCompendiumS1.7 - Craftworld Eldar.pdf [306.4 KiB]
Downloaded 1414 times
Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Looks good at a glance....

Wraith Seer: I forgot that Iyanden uses that title too. I guess it doesn't matter much as its extra ability cannot be used, but should the Titan really get the EA?

Warlock: Easy fix is to drop the Spirit Stones as a upgrade option. In the my list I took away Inspiring from the base Warlock and then gave the option to bring it back with Spirit Stone, granted with the points in my list made the same Warlock Titan 25 more. Is that good or bad? I don't know. But since your using the regular Titans as a base then Spirit Stone should be dropped so people won't try to take Inspiring twice even tho ability doesn't count double on units. It would just makes things cleaner.
Author:  adam77 [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Typos...
YME-LOC: individuals are missing the word 'points' after their points.
1.7.3.1: 'Spirit Seer' is two words in title but one word 'Spiritseer' in notes.
Author:  AxelFendersson [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
"Once the Avatar has left they may not return."

There is only one Avatar. so that should be "Once the Avatar has left it may not return."
Author:  Kaime [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
I noticed that the titan pulse weapons (including revenant pulsars) have lost the pulse rule, is this intentional?
Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Kaime wrote:
I noticed that the titan pulse weapons (including revenant pulsars) have lost the pulse rule, is this intentional?

Yes....Its been gone for years now. :D ;)
Author:  Kaime [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Sorry XD Im new at this
Author:  Chroma [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Kaime wrote:
Sorry XD Im new at this

No worries!

The pulse rule was removed in the official GW update of 2008 because it encouraged "static play" thusly: to maximize your shots, you had to sustain fire, because missing on the first shot, such as trying a hit-n-run double, or even advance, meant you got no hits at all; it was better to sustain fire and maximise potential hits and this was thought to be a non-Eldar way of fighting.

The rule was dropped and all pulse weapons were given an automatic two shots.

It's a good question!
Author:  semajnollissor [ Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
You might also want to note that the Spirit Stones rule was also dropped, and the Eldar titans picked up the leader ability.

In fact, perusing the 2008 update would be a good idea in general.
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Is the Hornet really supposed to be a 40cm move? That would make it the only unit to have that speed, including Vultures/Valks.
Author:  carlos [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Reaver jetbikes also move at that speed. This piece of information doesn't argue for or against the hornet's speed though, just wanted to show off.
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Of this I was anaware. If the 40cm wall has already been broken, there's less of an objection, though moving faster than the Vulture, which is really only nominally a skimmer, just seems wrong.
Author:  Ulrik [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
I would think that top speed shouldn't be the primary consideration for unit speed. 35cm is pretty slow as it is (with 15 minute turns and 30cm = 1 km, it's around 14km/h when marching), so I'd think that maneuverability should determine the speed stat. That is, reavers are 40cm speed because they can maintain higher speed than other stuff while hugging the ground and dodging trees, not because they're really faster.

Are hornets more maneuverable than bikes or vypers?
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Oh crapamahoya (yes, that's a technical term) I just remembered that Hornets have Star Engines as standard, making their top speed 33% faster than other standard Eldar Vehicles. Consider my comments withdrawn.
Author:  Morgan Vening [ Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Craftworld Eldar Army Section - DRAFT 2010
The Vampire Raider lists Autarch as carriable, but not Exarch. Does that mean Exarchs (and others like Spirit Seers) by default can't?

Morgan Vening
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/