Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

WIP v2 Platest Results -

 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Hey all,

I got the "Titan Pen" campaign game in this past weekend. 4K AMTL v Speed Freak Orcs.

They orc player had a little over 200 models in his army, I had roughly 37 models!

We went with titan's needing 50% assault AND tactical weapons - not just tactical weapons.

We also allowed a minor shortfall in titan points as it wasn't going to be pretty as is...

AMTL went with
1) Warlord 1
- PF + Multiple Rocket Pods + 2 Quake Cannons
- CML
- Legate
2) Warlord 2
- PF + Multiple Rocket Pods + 2 Quake Cannons
- CML
3) Ordinatus Golgotha
4) Hydra 1
5) Hydra 2
6) Cataphract Cohort 1
7) Cataphract Cohort 1
8) Cataphract Cohort 1
9) Thunderbolts + Thunderbolts

Orks went with something like the following (don't know if I have that right exactly) I know he had basically all trucks with boyz and 8 buggies or more in each formation. There was a flak wagon in each formation and nobs plus boss type orcs with 45cm MW hand guns.
1) Uge Mob (supreme cmdr) + flak
2) Big Mob + flak
3) Big Mob + flak
4) Big Mob + flak
5) Big Mob + flak
6) Big Mob + flak
7) Mob + flak
8) Mob + flak

Right, this game was crazy. He had so much stuff. If he wasn't actually playing like an ork, I was done for. I couldn't have killed half of that stuff. He spaced it all out in deployment and was rather menacing looking on the field with all those models.

Basically he could zoom 70 cm and then shoot 45cm at best. He would then charge on the following turn.

I managed to break plenty of formations thoughout the game and titans and tanks would only engage units that moved into range of fire after they activated, but I was picking on the smaller and big formations for the most part.

I wouldn't get charged until late in turn 2. He plowed over a flank hydra formation without effort. I then broke the formation from my fire.

He would then gake the UGE formation (that had been softened up by my Golgotha for two turns already) and charge into two warlords that were intermingled together. He managed to get about 30 units in FF range of the titans and 3 were in base to base with one titan while 2 stands were in based to base with the second titan.

With exception to the three models on the Warlord titan, all attacks went to Warlord titan 2. He knocked down all void shields on Warlord 2 and did no lasting damage. He did nothing to Warlord 1. AMTL Return attacks were pretty severe. Both PF's crushed the base to base goods and FF was pretty dead on. Orc saves aren't so great, so victory to the AMTL ensued.

This was the titanic battle. There was no supporting fire from either side.

At the end of turn 2, the orc player only had 3 unbroken formations. Only one of them had actually died to the man... err.. ork. Frankly, he had some bad dice in rally's three turns in a row. We tallied it, he was rolling slightly below average on rallys both first and second turn. Thus far, he had only killed a single hydra formation.

I wasn't positioned for squat though.

On turn 3 he activated and rolled a 1 on a formation that already had a blast marker. Reroll from supreme commander was gone from combat in turn 2 with the uge formation... so he held and regrouped. Now he only had two formations left to activate and I had my entire army - less one hydra unit.

He decided to retain and put a hurt on a hydra formation that he could charge. He races forward only get into base to base with 4 of the 6. He does receive all of his dice but the formation has blast markers and I had none. He manages to successfully kill 1 leman. I return and kill 3 ork units. Dice off  and I get 3 - he gets 6. He gets +2 for unit size and I get +2 for blast markers bonus - no inspiring. Cohort breaks and lose a model, orks take three more blast markers.

At this point - I've not taken an activation on turn 3 and he has one formation left to activate. I have 7 formations to activate. I probably cannot win the game. I definitely cannot get to where I need to on turn three as my AMTL is still to slow and objectives are far apart on a 4x8 table. On the other hand, I can break the remaining two units likely, or put some hurting on broken units that are scattered all over the table. Either way - not a good prospect for the Orks. I have units within 30 cm of all of his broken formations - or can have by the end of the turn - making at best - his rally roll is a 4+. With double on turn 2 and then tripples on turn 3, I can probably win the game if enough units do as ordered... and assuming he continues to roll below average on rallies.

The orks have a real chance to win if they can regroup on end of turn three - but getting to end of turn three will be costly. If they don't rally at the end of turn three - they are in for further big gun punishment on turn 4 and would lose the game without some descent to above average rallies. Definitely a gamble to consider here.

As this is a campaign game - he has to contemplate permanent losses in the campaign from his campaign bank if we go on. Although he might rally well on the end of turn three and push the draw on turn 4, he decides the risk of doing so may be too great. Too many of his commander models in his units have already died and they are the workhorse of his army.

After his two activations on thurn 3, he concedes to avoid further damage.

AMTL secures the Imperial Guard the Titan Pens - it's somewhat a hollow victory though. The win felt too much like a gimme due to a conservative player in a non-campaign setting, the orks would have pushed on.

We assumed he wouldn't lose but one more formation due to my firing... he there fore rolled as is for grins just to see how he would have rallied in the end phase - assuming I didn't do too good in shooting and assuming no models moved from where they were.

He would have rallied more than half of his broken formations had he not conceded... :(

In hindsight, he didn't play the right army, but the army could have done fine. He spent a lot of time fiddling with spacing of his units when moving them under double - so that the front units went full speed, but the back units were really getting stretched out and not taking full advantage of their move. This turned into his demise. First, he couldn't get the move he wanted. Second, he was having some space challenges when trying to keep up with his 'spacing' manouvre. Furthermore, my damage would chew the front units up and he would continually be set back by his own units not taking full advantage of their move on the previous turn.

We thought about his tactics post match and decided that had he operated in either of two modes, he would have easily won.

1st - he could have just doubled everything and not worried about spacing. More would have died to my barrages, but he would have engaged on turn 2 with a lot of his army and quite a bit would have gotten in base to base.

2nd - he could have crowded the objectives, and ignored charging toward me - forcing me to come to him. Chances are, I woudln't have been able to do enough to knock him off of the objectives. He could have focused on my warlord supremem commander and nothing else and achieved break their spirits. Keeping me off of his side with that kind of model count would have been relatively easy.

As far as the AMTL list goes, I think 50% titans is a pretty brutal requirement.

Also, I think the 50% of weapons on battle titans needs to include assault and tactical.

I think the titan formations need to have 'add ons' for their formations. The orkamedies mob has mini-titans that can be added to the big titans to create formations. It also has some fun stuff such as teleporting a titan down with his formation. They also have units that can not only shoot, but can really put out a beating in h-t-h combat.

I think our servitors could use a face lift in the combat and staying power department - think something like obliterator units.

The AMTL list has a real speed problem. I guess it can be made up in warhounds, but warhounds become staple land grabbers.

There's also no skimmers in the list. Vultures would be a nice add to the list to give a real threat.

To me, there are only two threats in the list. Cataphract Cohorts and titans. Everything else is pretty much a joke.

Even the golgotha is novelty in the end. 3 hits and no add ons means this guy is always broken after coming under fire 3 times. That's pretty sad. Base knight configurations have the same problem.

Knights need 2 DC each with no points increase or they need to remain and 1 DC each and become additions to the titan formations instead of stand alone formations. They are pretty pricy as is too. The requirement to take paladins first means these guys are uber expensive if you really are just after the firefight knights.

My early thoughts (only two AMTL games under my belt) are that it's a fun list because of the big firepower - but it lacks tactical tricks. It needs quite a few bonus' to contend with chaos, IG, orks, and swordwind eldar.

Hope that helps somebody out there. Now...

back to IG and tau games (and waiting patiently for chaos update)

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:34 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
On turn 3 he activated and rolled a 1 on a formation that already had a blast marker. Reroll from supreme commander was gone from combat in turn 2 with the uge formation...


Huh?  Is this a house rule?

SCs get to reroll 1 initiative test per turn.  There are no initiative tests related to assault resolution.

====

Regarding AMTL speed - yep.  The AMTL forces are all about your initial deployment.  Their powerhouses simply aren't fast enough to redeploy.  If you goof it up, there is no recovery.

I do, however, think that's okay from a play feel perspective.

You might want to contact Real Chris about some of those issues.  Needless to say, being the Siege IG champion, he has a lot of insights about forces where deployment is of supreme importance.




_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
NH,

I probably wasn't clear. He tried to activate and already had a blast marker on the formation. As he was trying to do a double, he received +2 to the dice roll but he also had a blast marker so he recieved a -1 to activate. His base initiative is 3. Therefore, he needed a 2 to successfully activate.

He rolled a 1.

He didn't have a SC as he already died.

Therefore, he had to hold.

In a hold, one gets to move, to shoot, or to regroup. He performed a regroup action.

Tis all.

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Quote (nealhunt @ 01 2005 Aug.,20:34)


Regarding AMTL speed - yep.  The AMTL forces are all about your initial deployment.  Their powerhouses simply aren't fast enough to redeploy.  If you goof it up, there is no recovery.

That's definitely the way it currently is. I'll agree. I think that's a problem though.


I do, however, think that's okay from a play feel perspective.

Understood. We disagree though. I don't think a list should be designed in such a way that it must deploy a certain way in order to have a chance. Flexability and the ability to change your tactics mid game makes these games quite enjoyable. I feel the list is to stringent on deployment - so much so that it hinders the game if your opponent doesn't cooperate with you. Not a good list for tournament style conditions IMHO.


You might want to contact Real Chris about some of those issues.  Needless to say, being the Siege IG champion, he has a lot of insights about forces where deployment is of supreme importance.

Understood, but even they are more flexible. I'm pretty confident in my general ability to play both tactically as well as strategically. Thanks for the heads up though.

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:42 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
I dont mind the general movement of the Titan Legions, a bad deployment should penalise you somewhat, and the list does have some faster elements so that if your concerned enough about it you might look into changing your armylist to include them, the titans themselves are already ballanced at their current speeds and since they are half your points there isnt alot you can reasonably do to change that at this point, unless you have a suggestion or insight.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:11 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
GrimS,

If something like the vulture or valkyrie was added - an= 35cm formation -  adeptus skimmer of sorts - that would help.

Aren't the adeptus mechanicus smart enough to build some kind of engine of war that is fast?


_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
It isnt that so much as the way army lists are set up in epic A, this list isnt representing all the forces and units the adeptus mechanicus can field, its just supposed to represent a titan legion with the support of its common allies and support units.
Alot of people have clamoured for super heavy tanks as well, and I'm sure the adeptus probably have a force thats heavy on the tanks, also a knight oriented and techguard list would also be apropriate, however every unit cant fit into the curent model of an army list, instead they are supposed to be tailored to represent a certain faction or even mirror forces available in a certain conflict.
Anyway I have seen what your suggesting proposed before, I myself wouldnt have a problem with it but I dont think it will make it onto the list based on previous experience.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:39 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Tactica:  Thanks for the clarification.  That makes much more sense.

As far as the AMTL working in a tourney, I think it may never happen for multiple reasons that I've outlined before.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Grim,

I hear you on the 'faction' based list approach. I think it makes sense to some degree. I also think each list needs enough flexability that it can manage in a tourny. If it can't, well then perhaps the list is being pursued from the wrong angle.

Maybe the AMTL list really should just be the AM list and more options given to it with a reduction of the 50% critera back in line with the other lists and more options such as some skimmers and superheavy tanks be added in.

I personally would rather have a list that had the flexability to become tourny worthy rather than just have "the AMTL list" because its a fluffy list to have in the franchise.



NH,

I agree. The list has problems on the tourny front. Frankly, I think as long as it has a 50% requirement to titans - its going to have that problem. Titans are a good thing in small supporting numbers, but are a bad thing as a core formation.

I think the list would be done some real justice to grow into an AM list instead of a very specific AMTL list - but that will probably never happen so... back to tau, chaos and IG :)





_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
I have played the list in it various playtest incarnations using the tourney rules several times aguansts IG and Space Marines and others, I still have more wins than losses so I think the list can do fine in a tournament setting.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:11 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Quote (Tactica @ 01 2005 Aug.,20:06)
As far as the AMTL list goes, I think 50% titans is a pretty brutal requirement.

And so it should be.

Remember both IG and SM can take a full 33% of their force in titans. If you start diluting the 50% titans minimum then what is the point of doing an AMTL list?

Cheers

James

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:42 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
Where IG / marines have a MAXIMUM that they can take, AMTL has a MINIMUM that they MUST take.

If AMTL had a MINIMUM that they MUST TAKE in titans, it would be adequate. Sure, they could go hog wild and take more if they wanted, but why limit the general's creativity to a margin of 50%?

If you know I'm taking half of my 5000 point army in titans, I'm sure you are going to go nuts in MW and TK weapons, its effect is elimination of metagame.

If you take it down to mandatory 1/3 titans, but allow me to take what I want from there, it means I can break the typical 1/3rd points, but it doesn't mean I have to take so many titans that I become tactically unstable.

50% titans as mandatory is more of a hinderance than an aid against some armies.

_________________
Rob


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 1:58 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm
Posts: 3305
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Quote (Tactica @ 08 2005 Aug.,23:42)
50% titans as mandatory is more of a hinderance than an aid against some armies.

Then against those armies take IG/SM with 33% titans.

Sorry if that sounds harsh but I can't see why people are surprised that a Titans army list has to field a lot of Titans...

Cheers

James

_________________
My TOEG- Blood Angels and Deathbolts
My Painting Blog- Evil Sunz, Goffs
My Epic trades list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 4:32 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
When we were first discussing some of the basics of the list I was pushing for a 67% minimum of titans (and other war engines).

There was a lot of discussion about building in a "weakness" into the AMTL army, and the thought was that the AMTL shouls have a problem with lack of activations compared to other "normal" armies.  Personally I think that the AMTL having to take a minimum of 50% titans is not that big of a deal.  OK, instead of taking something else you now have to take a Reaver or a par of Warhounds.  Big deal.

Hey, if you want to run the Adeptus Mechanicus Titan Legion, you're going to have to take some titans.

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: WIP v2 Platest Results -
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 6:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
I agree the lists name says it all. Adeptus Mechanicus Titan Legions  :D

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net