| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Reactor Meltdown! http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=5265 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Lord Inquisitor [ Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Reactor Meltdown! |
Minor thing, but something that has occured to me. The text for the battle titan critical is as follows... "Critical Critical: The Warlord?s plasma reactor has : been damaged. Roll a D6 for the Warlord in the end phase of every turn: on a roll of a 1, the reactor explodes destroying the Warlord, on a roll of 2 2-3 the Warlord suffers 1 more point of damage, and on a roll of 4 4-6 the reactor is repaired and will cause no further trouble. If the reactor explodes, any units within 5cms of the Warlord wi will take a hit on a roll of 4+." I would suggest changing it to the following: "Critical: The Warlord?s plasma reactor has been breached. Roll a D6 for each breach in the end phase of every turn: on a roll of a 1, the reactor explodes destroying the Warlord, on a roll of 2-3 the Warlord suffers 1 more point of damage, and on a roll of 4-6 the breach is repaired. If the reactor explodes, any units within 5cms of the Warlord will take a hit on a roll of 4+." It just tidies up the text a bit and makes it clear you can have multiple criticals. Lord Inquisitor. |
|
| Author: | Blarg D Impaler [ Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Reactor Meltdown! |
Makes sense, really. I'm kinda surprised that it wasn't done originally. I'd support this kind of a change. Of course, the real kick in the rump would be if one of the extra points of damage were to give you a second critical. If that one were to blow you up... |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Reactor Meltdown! |
Yep |
|
| Author: | dafrca [ Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Reactor Meltdown! |
Reads good to me. dafrca |
|
| Author: | dysartes [ Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Reactor Meltdown! |
One slight problem - that's a change to the core rules for Titans as presented in section 6.4 of the core rulebook, not a AMTL-specific point. I agree (in principle) that it is a good idea, and it is the way I'd been playing it anyway. I'll put it in, but it will need clearance by the ERC. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|