Difficult phrasing,
I've voted no but I would allow it IF the Reaver was the largest Titan on the field.
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=12480 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
Should the Reaver Titan be allowed to take the Supreme Commander upgrade? |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
Yes, please. |
|
| Author: | Justiniel [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
Difficult phrasing, I've voted no but I would allow it IF the Reaver was the largest Titan on the field. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
(Justiniel @ Apr. 30 2008,10:02) QUOTE I've voted no but I would allow it IF the Reaver was the largest Titan on the field. That's why I want the capability, when the Reaver is the largest Titan. I'm not going to put a Legate in a Reaver if I'm fielding a Warlord. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
Largest, or most expensive? |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I posted this before, but... For the "generic" AMTL list... no. For a specific legion based on the background... yes. |
|
| Author: | J0k3r [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I voted yes as I dont see any reason to limit this by size/expense. It should be up to the player to model it how he likes. |
|
| Author: | Dave [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
The Ork Warlord is mandated to go to the largest unit in terms of points, you could enforce the same thing for a supreme commander. If it's only an upgrade for Battle Titans, something like: 0-1 Supreme Commander, +50 points, Must upgrade the most expensive Battle Titan in an army list. |
|
| Author: | Lord Inquisitor [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I disagree on the "most expensive" front, but I do agree - the Warlord Battle Titan is the living embodiment of the Machine God, I think the SC should go on a Warlord if one is available. I would say something like "May only be applied to a Reaver if there are no Warlord (or larger) class Titans available". Tidy up the language, but there's no need to specify which Warlord takes the upgrade. |
|
| Author: | Charad [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I voted no. Titans do not need that kind of extra help. 
|
|
| Author: | CAL001 [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I say yes, if you want to create a fast moving Titan army then having this option is a good thing. Cheers Aaron |
|
| Author: | BlackLegion [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
No. Biggest Titan for the highest ranking officer. |
|
| Author: | Tiny-Tim [ Thu May 01, 2008 9:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
I've voted no, my tournament head is screaming out to let this happen, but the saving in cost could allow for an extra activation which can be vital in a tournament situation. For the general AMTL list only on Warlord or Emperor and as Neal says, something different for a subsequent list. |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Thu May 01, 2008 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Poll: Allow Supreme Commander on Reaver? |
With Neal and Tim, with one small exception - this is a specific legion! So you could do it...
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|