I voted no, but could see some arguement for a single type within the list. But as Tim says lets get a Titan focused list sorted and playtested before we get sidetracked again
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=12140 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
Let's hear your opinions. For reference, here is AMTL v3: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....t=11879 And here is my Knightworld list proposal: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....t=12122 |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
Bare essentials - 1 pattern, 2 at most. Edit: I voted yes, but they could reasonably be omitted entirely. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
Personally I don't even think they should have their own army list. They should be dropped entirely. |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
Yes, but only a select few, like Paladins, Lancers and Errants. Leave the full variety for the Knight list. |
|
| Author: | ragnarok [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I think that a single type of knight should be allowed. I was glacing through a friends white dwarf (I refuse to buy it) and I am sure that it had a chaos knight datasheet in it, or said that such a datasheet would soon be up on the website. If I wasn't miss reading it then it means GW is willling to admit to knights existing. |
|
| Author: | vanvlak [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
Nope- they should certainly exist, but as an independent list. |
|
| Author: | PlushWombat [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
If included in the main AMTL list...then it should limited to one type of Knight and then only as a replacment for sentinels...otherwise seperate Knights list! Regards PlushWombat |
|
| Author: | Pulsar [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
they should have there own list and not be part of the main one. |
|
| Author: | Tiny-Tim [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I've voted no. I would rather have a solid tested list that has enough fluff to stand on its own. There are problems with Knights - background, role, models. I remember them from when they first appeared and would like to see them return, but I want an AMTL list more. So separate list later is my point of view. |
|
| Author: | Gary [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I'd like to see a limited selection included as allies, in the same way that skitarii are included. The full range of knight units should be in a separate list. |
|
| Author: | Mephiston [ Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I voted no, but could see some arguement for a single type within the list. But as Tim says lets get a Titan focused list sorted and playtested before we get sidetracked again
|
|
| Author: | Pariah Press [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I vote yes. However, the heavy knights should be restricted to the Knight World list. Paladins, as the most commonly available Knight miniature, should be the type of Knight included in AMTL if there is only one choice available. I'd like to see Lancers, too, but I'm not so worked-up about it since I've seen the Knight World list. |
|
| Author: | Onyx [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
(Hena @ Mar. 24 2008,22:51) QUOTE I'm hoping for three. Close support (Lancer), medium range (Paladin) and heavy (the quake versions). I vote yes. I would definately like to see the 3 classes of Knight that Hena has listed. |
|
| Author: | Mark_Logue [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should Knights be allowed in the main AMTL list? |
I vote yes and I want all the types of knights available in the list! I have all the knights painted to match various titans so it does strongly bias my opinion. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|