5. Howling Banshees wording change to: "This attack is only effective against Infantry, Cavalry, and non-robotic Light Artillery units that do not have a Fixed armor save." ( instead of "This attack is ineffective against targets with an Armor Save.").

6. Striking Scorpion wording change to: "Unfortunately they do not have sufficient penetrating power to be effective versus armored targets, and thus only gain this benefit against Infantry, Cavalry, and non-robotic Light Artillery units that do not have a fixed armor save, against anything else they only roll 1d6 + CAF in Close Combat". (instead of "Unfortunately they do not have sufficient penetrating power to be effective versus armored targets such as vehicles, so when engaged with vehicles or larger units, they only roll 1D6 + CAF in Close Combat.")

Issues 5 and 6 have the side effect of reclassifying certain units (like the terminator) to walkers.

No, no no no, no, no, no. The wordings agreed to above REPLACED turning Terminators (and about two dozen or so other units) into Walkers. Changing the categorization of such units was determined to be too big of a change to deal with. This is why the wording specifies "... that do not have a fixed armor save..." as that applies to all three mentioned unit types. Thus that final sentence is incorrect.

Apart from the walkers issue mentioned above, that all looks okay to me.

4. Revenant titan costs 500 for TWO revenants. 3 VP for each. Wing save on template +3 (not 2+) and holofield is 3+ on charge; 4+ on advance; 5+ on charge

Do you mean "first fire" there?

Yey I helped