| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Net Epic Revision Update http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=26134 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | primarch [ Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Net Epic Revision Update |
Hi! Since I see we are now talking more about organizational/layout concerns and how to make the book more presentable and user friendly, I ask. Are we done with the revision? What I mean by this is are the main "nagging" issues for specific army lists been brought up and resolved? I understand that proof reading still needs to be done on several books, but that can be cobbled into the update of the layout. In simpler terms, are any issues with "stats" or "balance" still open? Once I get the input on everyone on this I can make a determination if this segment is "done" and we can focus on updating and how the process will be handled to insure maximum feedback. Primarch |
|
| Author: | Mattman [ Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
I think there are still a few issues to be agreed upon, I know we were still "discussing" a few things for the marines. |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Hi! Okay. I'll continue to monitor.  I am rapidly cleaning up the spreadsheet files now that I have the copy/pasted templates. It will be easier to manipulate them further after i am done formatting them. Should I send them to you directly Mattman or upload them in the appropriate thread? Primarch |
|
| Author: | Mattman [ Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Hey Primarch, I suspect it may take a little while to get everyone to agree to some of the things, but it isn't as if we don't have any rules to use  Put them on the excel thread and I will grab them from there. It will also allow other people to pick them up and give them a chance to play with them if they want to. Matt |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Mattman wrote: Hey Primarch, I suspect it may take a little while to get everyone to agree to some of the things, but it isn't as if we don't have any rules to use Put them on the excel thread and I will grab them from there. It will also allow other people to pick them up and give them a chance to play with them if they want to. Matt Hi! You are probably right. It's that I want to give assurance that unlike the last revision that from its start to producing the gold version about 10 years flew by, this time it will be far less than that. I will put them up on the excel thread then. I'm giving this my priority attention since an army builder is very important. Primarch |
|
| Author: | The Bissler [ Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Hello! Given that we're at the end of the year, I'm thinking that this may be a good time to review where we're at with this project... So, over to you Primarch, what's the latest?
|
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
The Bissler wrote: Hello! Given that we're at the end of the year, I'm thinking that this may be a good time to review where we're at with this project... So, over to you Primarch, what's the latest? Hi! I believe that what will constitute the bulk of net epic gold updating/correcting has been done and I will slowly attend to it over the course of 2014. The Platinum version is a much heavier lift since it will update the rules to the more modern units and such. Also I have been discussing with Mattman a full blown points system for people to settle the issue if points balance once and for all. Once I have hammered down the basic, that will be the first and most salient issue for 2014. Primarch |
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Sat Dec 28, 2013 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
primarch wrote: The Bissler wrote: Hello! Given that we're at the end of the year, I'm thinking that this may be a good time to review where we're at with this project... So, over to you Primarch, what's the latest? Hi! I believe that what will constitute the bulk of net epic gold updating/correcting has been done and I will slowly attend to it over the course of 2014. That's good news. I'm really looking forward to getting the gold version printed. |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Dwarf Supreme wrote: primarch wrote: The Bissler wrote: Hello! Given that we're at the end of the year, I'm thinking that this may be a good time to review where we're at with this project... So, over to you Primarch, what's the latest? Hi! I believe that what will constitute the bulk of net epic gold updating/correcting has been done and I will slowly attend to it over the course of 2014. That's good news. I'm really looking forward to getting the gold version printed. Hi! So do I. However I feel the need to make some sort of errata document to ensure that those whom have printed it over the last few years don't feel left out. Those can only print that portion of it to feel "complete". Primarch |
|
| Author: | Mattman [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Obviously if we pull together the errata docs first then everyone can use them until the actual army books are updated. To go with Primarchs plans on working on the points for Platinum, I am looking at reworking the way armies are constructed which will make them a lot more flexible and accessible to all Epic players. |
|
| Author: | primarch [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
Mattman wrote: Obviously if we pull together the errata docs first then everyone can use them until the actual army books are updated. To go with Primarchs plans on working on the points for Platinum, I am looking at reworking the way armies are constructed which will make them a lot more flexible and accessible to all Epic players. Hi! This is also a major priority. A more accessible army construction method is necessary. It will be easy to reconstruct the old formation, but also permit more flexible formations to accommodate a wider variety of them. Primarch |
|
| Author: | Irisado [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Net Epic Revision Update |
I look forward to seeing the errata document for the Gold rules. Thanks to everyone who has been involved in doing the arduous but necessary task of proof reading. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|