Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Landraiders http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=16530 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Pettan [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Yo El-duderinos Has there been a final decision about the cost/stats of landraiders? I feel this had been discussed so much. /P-man |
Author: | Warhead [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Apparently if we changed the price on these then we would be forced by the laws of nature to re-price everything. Eventually this would rip a hole in time and space and we would all end up watching daytime TV in our boxers while eating coco-pops... for some reason. Well that's what I had heard. Sorry I can't be any better help P/man. |
Author: | scream [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Last discussion ended with reducing Land Raider company cost down to 700 points ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Pettan [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Okay Scream. Thank you for that. /Pete |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (scream @ Aug. 25 2009, 07:55 ) Last discussion ended with reducing Land Raider company cost down to 700 points ![]() ![]() 700 points sound good for me. This is already corrected in army book? what about the detachments? still keeps 250 points or reduce to 225? |
Author: | scream [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
As far as I remember, detachment cost is still 250 points, discount is only for the company. Cost reduction has not been applied in the Adeptus Astartes pre-gold Codex. |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (scream @ Dec. 16 2009, 07:38 ) As far as I remember, detachment cost is still 250 points, discount is only for the company. Cost reduction has not been applied in the Adeptus Astartes pre-gold Codex. So you should always tend to take a company. Otherwise you have a bad degree, because you gave away too many points and one land raider less. no good deal, but it is ok. when to change the rules so that the company officially costs 700 points? |
Author: | scream [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
I think this point has been caught in the Adeptus Astartes Gold topic and WMN will correct it. |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (scream @ Dec. 16 2009, 07:54 ) I think this point has been caught in the Adeptus Astartes Gold topic and WMN will correct it. NICE ![]() |
Author: | Warmaster Nice [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Yup. The current download links on the forum (with a timestamp) should be the most up to date version of the rules. ![]() |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (Warmaster Nice @ Dec. 16 2009, 14:05 ) Yup. The current download links which download link? |
Author: | Warmaster Nice [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Pinned at the top of this section of the forum ![]() http://www.tacticalwargames.net/forums/ ... 14;t=16938 |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (Warmaster Nice @ Dec. 16 2009, 14:25 ) Pinned at the top of this section of the forum ![]() http://www.tacticalwargames.net/forums/ ... 14;t=16938 ah, now I know what you meant. But this link is indeed practically out of date, because already a lot of mistakes were found. not really playable in my view. |
Author: | Warmaster Nice [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Which errors for example? The link was updated a month and a half ago following a round of proof reading. No new errors have been brought to my attention since then. |
Author: | darkangel [ Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Landraiders |
Quote: (Warmaster Nice @ Dec. 16 2009, 14:35 ) Which errors for example? The link was updated a month and a half ago following a round of proof reading. No new errors have been brought to my attention since then. well, so something is missing already. the 95 entries in the forum "NetEpic errata already pointed out. ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |