As DA said, Knights are Knights. They are not Superheavy
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| super heavy damage table http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=10637 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | darkangel [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
does the "super heavy damage table" apply to all superheavies except by superheavies with wounds? so the table applies to stompa too, right? for no more discussion about that: the "super heavy damage table" applies to all units/models which are placed under the catergory superheavies and which have no wounds? |
|
| Author: | Kotrin [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
As usual, the discrepancy happens because "Superheavies with wounds" only exist in the Tyranid book, preventing the inclusion of the sentence you propose in the core rules. But you are right: Stompas follow the super heavy damage table. |
|
| Author: | darkangel [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
(Kotrin @ Sep. 26 2007,13:17) QUOTE As usual, the discrepancy happens because "Superheavies with wounds" only exist in the Tyranid book, preventing the inclusion of the sentence you propose in the core rules. But you are right: Stompas follow the super heavy damage table. thanks... |
|
| Author: | mm1145 [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
dose this mean any knite class as well? |
|
| Author: | darkangel [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
(mm1145 @ Sep. 27 2007,08:40) QUOTE dose this mean any knite class as well? knights are knights and superheavies are superheavies...it is a superheavy damage table not a knight damage table...or what do you mean? |
|
| Author: | mm1145 [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
it just seames strange to me that super heavyes are a same size as knite classes and yet knites are easer to distroy cos they do not have this damage table |
|
| Author: | Ulmo [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
They are lighter so less armoured, and have some shields instead. |
|
| Author: | darkangel [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
(mm1145 @ Sep. 27 2007,19:28) QUOTE it just seames strange to me that super heavyes are a same size as knite classes and yet knites are easer to distroy cos they do not have this damage table knights have a fixed shield save...i think it would be very unfair to give the knights a superheavy damage table too...balance is the key word...but if you read my states in the topic mega-gargant / warlord, then i do really believe that sometimes there is no balance... |
|
| Author: | zap123 [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
As DA said, Knights are Knights. They are not Superheavy
|
|
| Author: | darkangel [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | super heavy damage table |
(zap123 @ Sep. 28 2007,00:51) QUOTE right and if you are looking for a great knight, i can suggest you the "knight paragon" 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|