 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Tunnelers deviation |
|
scream
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation  Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:13 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 3:18 pm
Posts: 1619
Location: France
|
|
Hi all,
I have a question rules about tunnelers in NetEpic rules:
when a tunneler surfaces but is deviated to a location that is out of table limits, what happens ?
- tunneler and transported troops are destroyed ?
- tunneler is considered as surfacing at the limit of the play zone ?
- something else... ?
I searched in The NetEpic CoreRule but tunnelers are not explained in it, in Squat Rules but did not find anything about this case...
Thanks for your answers,
ScREaM
PS: sorry for my poor english...
_________________ Fair players live longer Epic40k.fr Techpriest
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Warmaster Nice
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:35 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:15 pm
Posts: 7948
Location: Denmark
|
Well if the rules doesn't state anythhing specifically I'd simply say that they have to surface at the limit of the play zone. Of course that's a matter of opinion and how competitive your opponent is. You could allways roll the dice for it: 1-3 the unit appears at the edge of the play area 4-6 it is lost and may not enter the game again. Werthe rof not the opponent should be awarded any VP's for it is another question of course.
Cheers! 
_________________
Sofa General
Nobody expects the Inquisition!!!
http://theepiclounge.wordpress.com/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
primarch
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:19 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
|
|
Hi!
We left it vague because different groups use different approaches.
Our recommended one is that the tunneler fails to surface that turn and can try again next turn.
Primarch
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
scream
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:31 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 3:18 pm
Posts: 1619
Location: France
|
|
Thanks Warmaster and Primarch for your answers,
Both answers are interesting, even if I personnaly prefer the second one (a Hellbore full of stands that is destroyed because of an "out table surfacing" would make me feel very disappointed)...
_________________ Fair players live longer Epic40k.fr Techpriest
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Jimbo
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:07 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 11:01 pm
Posts: 3495
Location: Wessex
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
CyberShadow
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:24 pm |
|
| Swarm Tyrant |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore
|
I am not 100% familiar with the NetEpic rules (  sorry! ), but I would probably say that the tunneller is treated as destroyed, and that the transported troops enter the board from the relevant table edge after a delay of a turn.
_________________ https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond. https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
scream
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:22 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 3:18 pm
Posts: 1619
Location: France
|
|
Thanks for all replys.
I think I'll play this out table deviation like this :
- if tunneler transport vehicle is destroyed and deviation is out of table, tunneler and all carried troups are destroyed
- if tunneler transport vehicle is not destroyed and deviation is out of table, tunneler can not surface this round
_________________ Fair players live longer Epic40k.fr Techpriest
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
primarch
|
Post subject: Tunnelers deviation Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:10 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
|
|
Hi!
Thats a pretty good compromise. I think I'll pass it on to the editor to include it in version 5.0.
Primarch
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
