| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Squats: Stubborn discussion (again) http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=134&t=22786 |
Page 5 of 5 |
| Author: | Moscovian [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Squats: Stubborn discussion (again) |
War engines (like a lot of these ideas) are in flux. The big ones could easily be allowed a 1+ initiative with a +1 on their rally (effectively giving them a 0+ rally initiative), but we would need to price them accordingly. I'm just pointing out that a 2+ initiative didn't affect much in the two games from the weekend. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Squats: Stubborn discussion (again) |
I think it's previously been more generally to represent the more elite nature of the Titan choices as compared to the chump infantry (IG & Guardians). ...Warhounds & Baneblades are the same DC etc, but that Warhounds are just more "elite" and so activate better? Eldar Titans are in a similar situation, same DC as SHT's in the case of Revenants but more elite than a Scorpion crew I guess? It's worth noting that those two have low numbers of crew, whilst Squat War Engines are going to have a lot of crew comparable to a Gargant or similar in crew numbers I guess. Just rambling... |
|
| Page 5 of 5 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|