Just to pick up on a couple of points....
zombocom wrote:
As noble an endeavor the attempt to produce an IP neutral catalogue is, it just doesn't have the player support. Most people play epic because they want to play a game set in the 40k universe, but with a more... epic... scale, and a more adult and tactical ruleset.
I'm just not interested in playing with generic looking tanks.
Basically, GW just killed off epic for good.
To a point, believe it or not, I agree with you. However, the lack of support and the feeling of minis being generic is simply because of a lack of familiarity.
At the end of the day, this is simply how it is. Each individual has a simple choice - They can either walk away from Epic because it is unsupported, or they can acknowledge that it is a great system with a limited miniature range and either only use units which have GW minis, find suitable minis from elsewhere which look different, or convert/scratch build their own. This is not a new situation. This is not even the worst thing that the Epic community has been through. People can still convert their own minis and they can still play games and talk about rules and all the other things that we always used to do.
We can either completely disregard GWs IP and simply wait for serious problems, which I am not prepared to do, or we can pack up turn off the lights and give up on Epic, which I am also not prepared to do, or we can adjust to the situation and make the best of it.
I agree that it is a real shame that GW doesn't support Epic. Thats not new.
I agree that more minis would be good, and I am worried about the future of the mini range. Thats not new.
At the end of the day, moral or not, GW are exercising a legal right and requirement, and as much as we may agree or disagree with it, or the background to it, it is what it is.
Steve54 wrote:
I loved epic before forum-ware and I'll still love and play it now, we are just back where we were a few years ago relying on GW,ebay, FW, non IP proxies and conversion work(and I dare say more local operations).
Exactly.
The number of people who relied on this avenue was tiny compared to even the player base of Epic. There are loads of people managing to play and enjoy the game who had never heard of the output of some people here.
I am honestly considering creating a new Marine Chapter army and replacing all Rhinos with DRM Intruder tanks or something similar, and for my own use calling them Viridian Pattern Rhinos. In fact, I am very tempted to start stockpiling infantry sprues and not worrying about vehicles at all, as they are far easier to find alternatives for. Lets not forget that we have more options for miniatiures, better organisation, more control over the game and a better environment and tournament scene than we have ever had in Epics past of all editions.
elsmore wrote:
Sure, but I've grown up with 40k and It's the rich background that interests me. I had to look up M-113 because I don't know what it is. I see it bears a passing resemblance to a Rhino but it is not, and it is not part of the background I love.
But no-one is taking that background away. A Rhino is still a Rhino and it is still available from GW or on eBay (in the hundreds). If you dont want to use proxy models then I can totally see where you are coming from and you dont have to. You may have to limit the races/units you use, but the same can be said for even 40K - GWs largest game. I want to work on a Tyranid force with a Parasite of Mortrex and swarms of winged Rippers.
elsmore wrote:
In a situation where the owner of IP does not cater for its fans, I feel unofficial products actually help to protect the worth of that IP. They even bolster sales in related 'official' products. I have bought, paints, brushes, glue, a game board, tools, official models etc. that I wouldn't have bought if I considered the EA community dead. Not that such smart reasoning is ever considered in IP related issues.
Somebody at GW needs to wake up and seize an opportunity to expand and / or retain interest in their universe. If they don't have the will or the resources to promote an epic scale line, why not offer limited production rights to individuals dedicated to keeping the system alive. The quality of work on show recently far outstrips anything GW has produced at this scale, so that's not an issue.
Yes, the situation sucks. I wish that GW would either give the game the support that (I feel) it deserves and which would be good for GW themselves, or it opened up and let people support it in GWs absence. But, I am sure that there are all sorts of legal issues about designs produced in CAD where scale is no longer an issue and ramifications for 40K minis simultaneously. Its not going to happen. And, while I would love Jervis to drop my these boards and say he wanted our help for fifth edition, thats looking less likely too.
I hate this situation as much as anyone (and probably more than most people), but thats the way it is, and I am not going to stop enjoying the game and running the site because of this, which - and lets be fair - GW has a legal right to do.