Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?

 Post subject: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:11 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:09 am
Posts: 93
Location: Toronto, Canada
In the Director's Cut article in Firepower 1, Jervis mentions that the playtesting team had to ultimately leave out a special rule for infantry seeking cover behind tanks while advancing. While the rule was interesting, he claims that they were never able to find a simple wording that would preclude abuse and exploitation by rules lawyers. I was giving the rule some more thought and realized that you could articulate it clearly if you paired it down a bit. Below is my simplified version of the rule... what do you think?

Image

Advancing Behind Vehicles
Infantry units may use vehicles in their detachment for cover when advancing towards the enemy line. To do this, arrange up to two infantry units (not cavalry!) behind each vehicle and in base to base contact. The vehicle must not be a skimmer, walker or something small like a bike, and must be from the same detachment as the infantry. The exact arrangement is flexible, but should be visibly appealing and logical. As long as they remain in base contact, these infantry units count as being in cover against incoming attacks. This cover is lost if the attacking detachment has any unit that both has line of sight to the infantry and is positioned behind an imaginary line drawn between the infantry and the vehicle (that is, behind the vehicle). Alternately, infantry units can be placed on either side of the vehicle (although all infantry must be placed on the same side) to protect against flank attacks. Draw a line along the side of the vehicle between the infantry units and the vehicle to determine cover as above.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:36 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6094
Location: UK
Yes that sounds simple enough to me, what you need though is a few images to show the idea.

I will try this rule out next time I have a game.

_________________
Vanguard Miniatures

Link, http://vanguardminiatures.co.uk/

Stockist of:

Vanguard Miniatures
BattleGroup Helios
Onslaught Miniatures
Pyrkol Gaming Markers
Gregster's Lab
Microworld Games
Troublemaker Games


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:42 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:09 am
Posts: 93
Location: Toronto, Canada
Certainly. In the following example, the forward Dark Angels Space Marine Squad on the right does NOT have cover, since (although it is in proper formation behind the Predator) there is an Ork unit behind the line between the Marines and the Predator. The second Space Marine Squad on the left (behind the Predator Annihilator) IS in cover, however, as the attacking Ork detachment is fully in front of the red line. If the Ork player chooses to roll on the "no cover" column, then he can only kill up to four units: the two Predators and the two units of the forward squad. The rear squad will be unharmed (although perhaps cowering behind the burning wreck of the Predator Annihilator!).

Note the two possible ways to arrange infantry units behind vehicles. The "broad" formation for the second Dark Angels squad is particularly appropriate for square-based infantry (although either could be used in that case as well). Also, note that the E40k rules normally consider a multi-model based unit to be within a distance, under a template or behind a line if at least half of the individual figurines on the base are. In this case, the Dark Angels player just gave the Orks the benefit of the doubt. What friendly sportsmanship!

Attachment:
E40kVehicleCoverExample.jpg
E40kVehicleCoverExample.jpg [ 545.86 KiB | Viewed 3176 times ]


Last edited by Commander Karth on Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 9625
Location: Manalapan, FL
I don't play E40k but that illustration makes the rule and application perfectly clear. Nice work!

_________________
He's a lawyer and a super-villian. That's like having a shark with a bazooka!

-I HAVE NO POINT
-Penal Legion-Fan list
-Help me make Whitescars not suck!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:36 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6094
Location: UK
Nice diagram and explanation, good stuff.

_________________
Vanguard Miniatures

Link, http://vanguardminiatures.co.uk/

Stockist of:

Vanguard Miniatures
BattleGroup Helios
Onslaught Miniatures
Pyrkol Gaming Markers
Gregster's Lab
Microworld Games
Troublemaker Games


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:43 pm
Posts: 2556
Location: UK
So do you have to be in base contact with the vehicle? The second stand of marines in the right is not

_________________
Kyrt's Battle Result Tracker (forum post is here)
Kyrt's trade list


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:03 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:09 am
Posts: 93
Location: Toronto, Canada
I was thinking there could be two basic arrangments, as seen in the diagram. Either the infantry are side to side and both in base contact with the vehicle, or the two infantry are stacked behind the vehicle. Those seem to be the most logical arrangements.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:39 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6094
Location: UK
The stacked example was in the original diagram from Jervis's article.

_________________
Vanguard Miniatures

Link, http://vanguardminiatures.co.uk/

Stockist of:

Vanguard Miniatures
BattleGroup Helios
Onslaught Miniatures
Pyrkol Gaming Markers
Gregster's Lab
Microworld Games
Troublemaker Games


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Simple Alternative to Vehicle Cover Rules?
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 12:31 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:09 am
Posts: 93
Location: Toronto, Canada
moredakka wrote:
The stacked example was in the original diagram from Jervis's article.


Ah, looking at the article again that is indeed where I got the idea! It definitely "looks right" as a formation (although it might be weird for 20mm square bases).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net