Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Questoris Mechanicus (Developmental) |
Vaaish |
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:49 pm
|
|
Replies: 147 Views: 104309
|
I'd agree that things need to feel right, but you should probably base that feeling on the unit performance within the framework of units in the list and similar units in other lists tempered by the stats GW has put out for the models rather than what the mode looks like. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Questoris Mechanicus (Developmental) |
Vaaish |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:23 pm
|
|
Replies: 147 Views: 104309
|
I really don't see the point of this. You're basing gameplay decisions on the look of a model, not it's stats and it's really not a good direction to do anything epic based. The ratio of legs to torso can't come into play here simply because it may vary from iteration to iteration. For example, look... |
|
|
Forum: Vanguard Miniatures Topic: Cybershadows Thread |
Vaaish |
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 104 Views: 477006
|
I'd build an admech army with these. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Questoris Mechanicus (Developmental) |
Vaaish |
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 147 Views: 104309
|
I wouldn't base stats on physical size since there's a lot of variety in model collections. I think the current stats are fine. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: The Return of Adeptus Titanicus |
Vaaish |
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:10 am
|
|
Replies: 1185 Views: 357846
|
In epic terms that's too granular a difference to show up since the only epic difference is basically the one dc. Same speed, armor, vs as a warlord and we can already cover the load out with quake, cml, clp and two arm weapons. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: The Return of Adeptus Titanicus |
Vaaish |
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 1185 Views: 357846
|
Been talking with armiger about it and It's basically a warlord that has cml and clp. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: The Return of Adeptus Titanicus |
Vaaish |
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 5:05 pm
|
|
Replies: 1185 Views: 357846
|
...and it's proper silly. |
|
|
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Questoris Mechanicus v1.56 vs Tau |
Vaaish |
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:12 pm
|
|
Replies: 5 Views: 1865
|
Maybe Armigers shouldn't get the benefits at all? |
|
|
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Questoris Mechanicus v1.56 vs Tau |
Vaaish |
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:05 pm
|
|
Replies: 5 Views: 1865
|
Cool report! Reading through seemed a bit one sided but Tau had some really bad rolls offset by good saves. I'm also on the fence about the half hackdowns rule. As a knight player it does help prevent your lances from melting, but it may be a bit good. If you're up for it, try a match and just let t... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Knight Crusade 1.0 |
Vaaish |
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:34 pm
|
|
Replies: 29 Views: 19850
|
We should probably move this over to the AMTL thread, but I don't think it's quite as good synergy as you anticipate. There's a lot of similarities between the two and knights are more expensive. Most lists that would take them are going to need to free up at least 50 points if they wanted to swap f... |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: NetEA tourney at HMGS Fall In 11/10/2018_OFFICIAL RESULTS |
Vaaish |
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:16 pm
|
|
Replies: 7 Views: 2522
|
Thanks! It would probably be best to put them in the AMTL threads for easier reference. |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: NetEA tourney at HMGS Fall In 11/10/2018_OFFICIAL RESULTS |
Vaaish |
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:55 am
|
|
Replies: 7 Views: 2522
|
Thanks for posting the results. Do you have the lists for the AMTL players? I'm curious to see what they took.
(and if they are reading this, I'd love batreps or thoughts on the AMTL list too ) |
|
|
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Adepta Sororitas 2.02 vs Legio Gryphonicus |
Vaaish |
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 1:45 pm
|
|
Replies: 3 Views: 1850
|
LOL. I think the RNG hates you. Thanks for the report!
Maybe roll real dice via skype and record the result instead of using that crap one in vassal? It's always been really weird. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Questoris Mechanicus (Developmental) |
Vaaish |
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 11:23 pm
|
|
Replies: 147 Views: 104309
|
NM my point is invalid. We do actually have SR in a global sense under the specialist rules. I just never think about them as Special Rules since they are in the main rulebook. From a list reference standpoint, I'd still just call the rule "ignore shields" so it's easier to digest. Also, r... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Questoris Mechanicus (Developmental) |
Vaaish |
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:58 pm
|
|
Replies: 147 Views: 104309
|
What's the point of making a rule for something that's already covered though? Doesn't that just add complexity for the sake of complexity? It's a bit like how we currently treat weapons that ignore cover or gain first strike by adding that to the weapon notes. We don't (at least to my knowledge) ha... |
|
|
Sort by: |